Responding to COVID-19 With the Aid of Mutually Beneficial Partnerships in Education

被引:8
作者
Biag, Manuelito [1 ]
Gomez, Louis M. [1 ,2 ]
Imig, David G. [1 ,3 ]
Vasudeva, Ash [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Fdn Adv Teaching, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] UCLA, Grad Sch Educ & Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Coll Educ, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
iLEAD; improvement science; boundary crossing; value creation; mutually beneficial partnerships; SCHOOL; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2020.621361
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the structures and routines of K-12 education. Districts and school systems worldwide continue to adapt their ways of working to address a variety of challenges-many of whose dimensions are complex, dynamic, and not entirely known. Without cooperation and collaboration among stakeholders, institutions, and communities, we will be less able to address students' social, emotional, and learning needs. In this paper, we present evidence that suggests mutually beneficial partnerships between local education agencies (LEAs) and institutions of higher education (IHEs), grounded in improvement science, can serve as an essential resource to address dilemmas brought about by the pandemic. We examine the work of four partnerships in the Improvement Leadership Education and Development (iLEAD) Network. Our analysis suggests that what matters in this period of uncertainty is that partnerships take a systems perspective, pay direct attention to the needs of critical users, avoid pre-determined programs and solutions, and engage in disciplined inquiry across institutional boundaries to affect positive and lasting change. A deeper understanding of how these partnerships operate-their principles, routines, methods, and tools-can help educational systems support students during the current global health crisis.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Aguilar J., 2017, Exploring Improvement Science in Education: Promoting College Access in Fresno Unified School District | Policy Analysis for California Education
[2]  
Akkerman S.F., 2011, INT J EDUC RES, V50, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJER.2011.04.002
[3]   Social Capital and Community Resilience [J].
Aldrich, Daniel P. ;
Meyer, Michelle A. .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2015, 59 (02) :254-269
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Introduction to Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis
[5]  
Barge JK, 2002, COMMUN THEOR, V12, P375, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00275.x
[6]   Achieving successful school-university collaboration [J].
Borthwick, AC ;
Stirling, T ;
Nauman, AD ;
Cook, DL .
URBAN EDUCATION, 2003, 38 (03) :330-371
[7]  
Bourgeois III L.J., 1981, Acad. Manag. Rev., V6, P29
[8]  
Bradford S., 2019, STORY TENNESSEE EARL
[9]  
Brown C, 2018, NETWORKS FOR LEARNING: EFFECTIVE COLLABORATION FOR TEACHER, SCHOOL AND SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT, P1, DOI 10.4324/9781315276649
[10]  
Bryk A.S., 2002, TRUST SCH