Relationship between self-reported cognitive and behavioural empathy among medical students

被引:2
作者
Klockner, Christina Cronauer [1 ]
Gerbase, Margaret W. [1 ]
Nendaz, Mathieu [1 ,2 ]
Baroffio, Anne [1 ]
Junod, Noelle Perron [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Geneva Fac Med, Unit Dev & Res Med Educ, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Gen Intermal Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Geneva Univ Hosp, Inst Primary Care, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Medical students; Empathy; Cognitive; Behavioural; VERONA CODING DEFINITIONS; SIMULATED PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN EMPATHY; CLINICAL EMPATHY; JEFFERSON SCALE; CONSULTATIONS; ASSESSMENTS; EDUCATION; DECLINE; GENDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.053
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between cognitive and behavioural empathy in medical students. Methods: Fourteen 4th year medical students recruited on the basis of their scores on the self-reported Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE-S) were divided into two groups: low JSE-S scorers (n = 8) (M = 96.75, SD = 10.3) and high JSE-S scorers (n = 6) (M = 121.3, SD = 2.94). They were discreetly videotaped while taking history with an incognito standardized patient. Students' behavioural empathy was measured using the Verona Coding System (VR-CoDES-P) and rating of non-verbal behaviour. Results: Patients expressed the same number of concerns per encounter in both groups but gave more cues to high-scorers (p = 0.029). However, students of both groups demonstrated the same amount of verbal empathy (high: 16% vs low: 15% p = 1.00). High JSE-S scorers' non-verbal communication tended to be rated slightly higher than low JSE-S-scorers with a higher use of facial expression (p = 0.008). Conclusion: This study did not reveal any differences of students' verbal empathy to patients' cues and concerns between low and high JSE_S scorers. Practice implications: The VR-CoDES_P is a useful tool to assess medical students and physicians empathic behaviour, allowing to disentangle the different components of empathy. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. CC_BY_NC_ND_4.0
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 901
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Skills for Communicating with Patients
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, VR CODES CODING MANU
[3]   The Development and Validation of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ) [J].
Batchelder, Laurie ;
Brosnan, Mark ;
Ashwin, Chris .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01)
[4]   Medical Students' Self-Reported Empathy and Simulated Patients' Assessments of Student Empathy: An Analysis by Gender and Ethnicity [J].
Berg, Katherine ;
Majdan, Joseph F. ;
Berg, Dale ;
Veloski, Jon ;
Hojat, Mohammadreza .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (08) :984-988
[5]   Measuring nonverbal behavior in clinical interactions: A pragmatic guide [J].
Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle ;
Ruben, Mollie A. ;
Hall, Judith A. ;
Mast, Marianne Schmid .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2018, 101 (12) :2209-2218
[6]   The link between perception of clinical empathy and nonverbal behavior: The effect of a doctor's gaze and body orientation [J].
Brugel, Sabrina ;
Postma-Nilsenova, Marie ;
Tates, Kiek .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (10) :1260-1265
[7]   Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues [J].
Butow, PN ;
Brown, RF ;
Cogar, S ;
Tattersall, MHN ;
Dunn, SM .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2002, 11 (01) :47-58
[8]   Reports of the Decline of Empathy During Medical Education Are Greatly Exaggerated: A Reexamination of the Research [J].
Colliver, Jerry A. ;
Conlee, Melinda J. ;
Verhulst, Steven J. ;
Dorsey, J. Kevin .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (04) :588-593
[9]   MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH [J].
DAVIS, MH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) :113-126