Conservative management in breech deliveries leads to similar results compared with cephalic deliveries

被引:19
作者
Molkenboer, J. F. M.
Vencken, P. M. L. H.
Sonnemans, L. G. J.
Roumen, F. J. M. E.
Smits, F.
Buitendijk, S. E.
Nijhuis, J. G.
机构
[1] Atrium Med Ctr Heerlen, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] TNO, Prevent & Hlth, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
term breech; cephalic position; neonatal morbidity; neonatal mortality; elective cesarean section; CESAREAN-SECTION; NETHERLANDS; TERM; TRIAL; MORTALITY; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1080/14767050701449703
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare the difference in neonatal mortality and morbidity between breech and cephalic presentations at term. Methods. This was a retrospective matched cohort study in two centers between July 1998 and April 2000, including all breech deliveries between 37(+0) and 41(+6) weeks, except cases with multiple gestations and antepartum intrauterine deaths. All breech presentations were matched with two cephalic presentations. Onset of labor and route of delivery were recorded, and neonatal data were categorized into variables belonging to serious morbidity or moderate morbidity. Results. One thousand one hundred and nineteen deliveries were included. Three hundred and seventy- three babies were in breech position and 746 in cephalic position. The gestational age and birth weight of the babies in the breech group were lower than in the cephalic group ( p < 0.001). Congenital abnormalities occurred more often in the breech group ( p < 0.005). An elective cesarean section was performed in 23.3% of breech presentations versus 3.5% of cephalic presentations ( p < 0.001). Emergency cesarean sections were done in 29.2% of breech presentations versus 8.8% of cephalic presentations ( p < 0.001). Children born in breech presentation had lower Apgar scores after 1 minute ( p < 0.0001), but 5- minute Apgar scores were the same in both groups ( p 0.22). Children born in breech presentation received significantly more resuscitation than children born in cephalic presentation ( p < 0.001). In both groups no perinatal mortality occurred. No differences were observed in percentages of children with serious or moderate neonatal morbidity between the breech and cephalic lies. Conclusions. Although the numbers are small, this study shows that the conservative ( vaginal) approach in selected fetuses in breech position can be safely pursued with neonatal results similar to fetuses in cephalic presentation.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 603
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BRENNER W E, 1978, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, V21, P511, DOI 10.1097/00003081-197806000-00020
[2]  
Buitendijk S E, 2004, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V148, P1855
[3]   The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity [J].
Gilliam, M ;
Rosenberg, D ;
Davis, F .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (06) :976-980
[4]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[5]   THE FREQUENCY OF BREECH PRESENTATION BY GESTATIONAL-AGE AT BIRTH - A LARGE POPULATION-BASED STUDY [J].
HICKOK, DE ;
GORDON, DC ;
MILBERG, JA ;
WILLIAMS, MA ;
DALING, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (03) :851-852
[6]  
JONES O, 1993, AUST NZ J OBSTET GYN, V33, P17
[7]   Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization [J].
Lydon-Rochelle, M ;
Holt, VL ;
Martin, DP ;
Easterling, TR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (18) :2411-2416
[8]   Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. [J].
Lydon-Rochelle, M ;
Holt, VL ;
Easterling, TR ;
Martin, DP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (01) :3-8
[9]  
Molkenboer J F M, 2004, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V16, P357
[10]  
Molkenboer JFM, 2003, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V110, P948, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02052.x