The impact of digital finance on green innovation: resource effect and information effect

被引:46
作者
Liu, Yanxia [1 ]
Chen, Le [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, 15 North Third Ring East Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
关键词
Green innovation; Digital finance; Financial constraints; Information effect; Optimism bias; Synchronicity; PRODUCT INNOVATION; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; REGULATION FD; CASH FLOW; CORPORATE; INVESTMENT; ENVIRONMENT; POLLUTION; INDUSTRY; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-21802-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To realize "the future we want" proposed by the UN Development Agenda, it is highly necessary for China, which is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, to find ways to boost the green innovation of domestic firms. Digital finance, as an emerging product of the contemporary digital economy, provides a new research perspective for green innovation. Based on 2011-2019 panel data on A-shared listed companies in China, this article establishes a regression model and provides empirical evidence that digital finance can promote green innovation by exerting resource and information effects. Our results reveal that (1) digital finance can stimulate enterprises' green innovation by increasing the coverage of digital finance and the depth of use. (2) Digital finance can significantly improve the quantity and quality of green innovation by alleviating enterprises' financial constraints and giving full play to the internal and external information effect. (3) The discussion shows that the effect of digital finance is heterogeneous and can more significantly and effectively stimulate the green innovations of enterprises with lower analyst optimism bias and higher synchronicity.
引用
收藏
页码:86771 / 86795
页数:25
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, REAL FUT WE WANT ALL
[2]  
Awan U, 2020, HDB ENV MAT MANAGEME, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_177-1
[3]   Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations [J].
Banerjee, SB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2001, 38 (04) :489-513
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   How does information technology affect productivity? Plant level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills [J].
Bartel, Ann ;
Ichniowski, Casey ;
Shaw, Kathryn .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 122 (04) :1721-1758
[6]   THE SELF-SERVING MANAGEMENT HYPOTHESIS - SOME EVIDENCE [J].
BENSTON, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1985, 7 (1-3) :67-84
[7]   What drives successful implementation of pollution prevention and cleaner technology strategy? The role of innovative capability [J].
Bhupendra, Kumar Verma ;
Sangle, Shirish .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 155 :184-192
[8]   OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND VOTING ON ANTITAKEOVER AMENDMENTS [J].
BRICKLEY, JA ;
LEASE, RC ;
SMITH, CW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 20 (1-2) :267-291
[9]   Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom [J].
Brown, James R. ;
Fazzari, Steven M. ;
Petersen, Bruce C. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2009, 64 (01) :151-185
[10]   Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility [J].
Bushee, BJ ;
Noe, CF .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2000, 38 :171-202