Using discrete choice experiments to estimate willingness-to-pay intervals

被引:19
作者
Schlereth, Christian [1 ]
Eckert, Christine [2 ]
Skiera, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Mkt, D-60323 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Mkt Discipline Grp, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Willingness-to-pay; Willingness-to-pay intervals; Discrete choice experiments; Scale heterogeneity; CONTINGENT VALUATION; RESERVATION PRICE; CONSUMERS; MODELS; UNCERTAINTY; EXAGGERATION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11002-012-9177-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Willingness-to-pay has always been conceptualized as a point estimate, frequently as the price that makes the consumer indifferent between buying and not buying the product. In contrast, this article estimates willingness-to-pay (WTP) as an interval based on discrete choice experiments and a scale-adjusted latent-class model. The middle value of this interval corresponds to the traditional WTP point estimate and depends on the deterministic utility; the range of the interval depends on price sensitivity and the utility's error variance (scale). With this conceptualization of WTP, we propose a new measure, the attractiveness index, which serves to identify attractive consumers by combining knowledge about their price sensitivities and error variances. An empirical study demonstrates that the attractiveness index identifies the most attractive consumers, who do not necessarily have the largest WTP point estimates. Furthermore, consumers with comparable preferences can differ in their purchase probability by an average of 16%, as reflected in differences in their WTP intervals, which yields implications for more customized target marketing.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 776
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Dissecting the random component of utility [J].
Louviere, J ;
Street, D ;
Carson, R ;
Ainslie, A ;
Deshazo, JR ;
Cameron, TA ;
Hensher, D ;
Kohn, R ;
Marley, T .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2002, 13 (03) :177-193
[12]  
Magidson J., 2007, P SAWTOOTH SOFTWARE
[13]   THE USE OF PRODUCT SAMPLING AND ADVERTISING - EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF EXPOSURE AND DEGREE OF ADVERTISING CLAIM EXAGGERATION ON CONSUMERS BELIEF STRENGTH, BELIEF CONFIDENCE, AND ATTITUDES [J].
MARKS, LJ ;
KAMINS, MA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1988, 25 (03) :266-281
[14]   How Should Consumers' Willingness to Pay Be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches [J].
Miller, Klaus M. ;
Hofstetter, Reto ;
Krohmer, Harley ;
Zhang, Z. John .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (01) :172-184
[15]   Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis [J].
Moorthy, S ;
Ratchford, BT ;
Talukdar, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1997, 23 (04) :263-277
[16]   The Devil Is in the Deliberation: Thinking Too Much Reduces Preference Consistency [J].
Nordgren, Loran F. ;
Dijksterhuis, A. P. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (01) :39-46
[17]   Estimating willingness to pay with exaggeration bias-corrected contingent valuation method [J].
Park, Joo Heon ;
MacLachlan, Douglas L. .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2008, 27 (04) :691-698
[18]   Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: A comparison of empirical treatments [J].
Shaikh, Sabina L. ;
Sun, Lili ;
van Kooten, G. Cornelis .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (01) :115-125
[19]   APPLIED WELFARE ECONOMICS WITH DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS [J].
SMALL, KA ;
ROSEN, HS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1981, 49 (01) :105-130
[20]   THE ROLE OF THE SCALE PARAMETER IN THE ESTIMATION AND COMPARISON OF MULTINOMIAL LOGIT-MODELS [J].
SWAIT, J ;
LOUVIERE, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1993, 30 (03) :305-314