Attitudes toward Abortion among Providers of Reproductive Health Care

被引:10
作者
Dodge, Laura E. [1 ,2 ]
Haider, Sadia [1 ,2 ]
Hacker, Michele R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 330 Brookline Ave KS 3, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.whi.2016.06.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Access to abortion continues to decrease in the United States. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes toward abortion among clinicians who provide reproductive health care. Methods: Clinician members of several reproductive health professional organizations completed a self-administered survey that assessed their attitudes toward abortion. Results: A total of 278 clinicians who provided clinical reproductive health services within the United States were included. Nearly all strongly agreed that abortion should be available in cases of rape (89.6%), incest (89.2%), life endangerment (93.2%), health endangerment (91.0%), and fetal anomaly (85.9%). Although most strongly disagreed that spousal notification (81.3%) and spousal consent (86.6%) should be required for married women, fewer strongly disagreed that parental notification (57.6%) and parental consent (66.9%) should be required for minors. Respondents were generally supportive of private insurance coverage (70.1% strongly agreed) and Medicaid coverage (65.0% strongly agreed) for abortion services. Support for legal abortion and public funding of abortion were significantly associated with being female (both p <= .03) and having no personal religious affiliation (both p <= .04). Younger respondents and men were more supportive of third-party involvement and mandatory counseling (all p <= .02). Abortion providers were significantly more supportive of abortion access (legality of abortion, public and private funding, no third-party involvement, and no mandated counseling) than nonproviders (all p < .001). Conclusions: Although reproductive health care providers were generally supportive of legal abortion and funding for abortion, lower support among younger respondents may indicate future difficulties in maintaining a clinical workforce that is willing to provide abortion care. (C) 2016 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 516
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GEOGR REG
  • [2] [Anonymous], MONTHL STAT UPD MAJ
  • [3] [Anonymous], REP TASK FORC MENT H
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, Just the Last Four Years, States Have Enacted 231 Abortion Restrictions [Internet]
  • [5] Provision of abortion by mid-level providers: international policy, practice and perspectives
    Berer, Marge
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2009, 87 (01) : 58 - 63
  • [6] Obstetrician-gynecologists' beliefs about when pregnancy begins
    Chung, Grace S.
    Lawrence, Ryan E.
    Rasinski, Kenneth A.
    Yoon, John D.
    Curlin, Farr A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (02)
  • [7] Knowledge of State-level Abortion Laws and Regulations Among Reproductive Health Care Providers
    Dodge, Laura E.
    Haider, Sadia
    Hacker, Michele R.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2013, 23 (05) : E281 - E286
  • [8] Association between abortion and breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on prospective studies
    Guo, Jun
    Huang, Yubei
    Yang, Lei
    Xie, Zhengqiang
    Song, Shuhong
    Yin, Juan
    Kuang, Li
    Qin, Wengang
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2015, 26 (06) : 811 - 819
  • [9] Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Objections to and Willingness to Help Patients Obtain an Abortion
    Harris, Lisa H.
    Cooper, Alexandra
    Rasinski, Kenneth A.
    Curlin, Farr A.
    Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 905 - 912
  • [10] Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2011
    Jones, Rachel K.
    Jerman, Jenna
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2014, 46 (01) : 3 - 14