Regularities in eyewitness identification

被引：104
作者：
Clark, Steven E. [1 ]
Howell, Ryan T. [2 ]
Davey, Sherrie L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Psychol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Calif State Coll Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA 93309 USA
来源：
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR | 2008年 / 32卷 / 03期
基金：
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词：
eyewitness identification; meta-analysis;
D O I：
10.1007/s10979-006-9082-4
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
What do eyewitness identification experiments typically show? We address this question through a meta-analysis of 94 comparisons between target-present and target-absent lineups. The analyses showed that: (a) correct identifications and correct-nonidentifications were uncorrelated, (b) suspect identifications were more diagnostic with respect to the suspect's guilt or innocence than any other response, (c) nonidentifications were diagnostic of the suspect's innocence, (d) the diagnosticity of foil identifications depended on lineup composition, and (e) don't know responses were nondiagnostic with respect to guilt or innocence. Results of diagnosticity analyses for simultaneous and sequential lineups varied for full-sample versus direct-comparison analyses. Diagnosticity patterns also varied as a function of lineup composition. Theoretical, forensic, and legal implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码：187 / 218
页数：32
相关论文
共 85 条
[11]   A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory [J].
Deffenbacher, KA ;
Bornstein, BH ;
Penrod, SD ;
McGorty, EK .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2004, 28 (06) :687-706
[12]   Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference [J].
Deffenbacher, Kenneth A. ;
Bornstein, Brian H. ;
Penrod, Steven D. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2006, 30 (03) :287-307
[13]  
Dekle DJ, 1996, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V10, P1
[14]  
Devenport J.L., 1996, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, V11, P35
[15]   DISTINGUISHING ACCURATE FROM INACCURATE EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS VIA INQUIRIES ABOUT DECISION-PROCESSES [J].
DUNNING, D ;
STERN, LB .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (05) :818-835
[16]   A preidentification questioning effect: Serendipitously increasing correct rejections [J].
Dysart, JE ;
Lindsay, RCL .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 25 (02) :155-165
[17]  
EBBESEN EB, 1996, EXPERT EVIDENCE, V5, P2
[18]   WHAT DO WE NOT KNOW ABOUT EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION [J].
EGETH, HE .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 48 (05) :577-580
[19]  
EGETH HE, 1995, PSYCHOL SCI HUMAN AF, P151
[20]   EXPERT TESTIMONY ABOUT EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION - A CRITIQUE [J].
ELLIOTT, R .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1993, 17 (04) :423-437
123456789