Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation

被引:5
作者
Li, Meng-Hao [1 ]
Haynes, Kingsley [1 ]
Kulkarni, Rajendra [1 ]
Siddique, Abu Bakkar [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Schar Sch Policy & Govt, Arlington, VA 22201 USA
关键词
COVID-19; Mitigation; Social distancing; Shelter-in-Place; Pro-social characteristics;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115308
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
During the pre-vaccine period, the success of containing the spread of COVID-19 depends upon how communities respond to non-pharmaceutical mitigation policies such as social distancing, wearing of masks, retail and dining constraints, crowd limitation, and shelter-in-place orders. Of these policies, shelter-in-place and social distancing are of central importance. By using county-level mobility data as a measure of a community's voluntary compliance with social distancing policies, this study found that counties who received strong state social distancing policy directives and who had a high pro-social character showed lower mobility on retail and rec-reation mobility and grocery and pharmacy mobility (better social distancing) after states reopened from shelter -in-place orders. Counties that experienced a longer duration of shelter-in-place orders showed higher mobility (less social distancing), implying that the duration of the shelter-in-place order deteriorated social distancing response after reopening. This may be because reopening sent a "safe" signal to these counties or resulted in a response to the pent-up demand inducing higher mobility. The results indicate that implementing shelter-in -place and social distancing policies to slow down the transmission of COVID-19 were not necessarily effective in motivating a county to reduce mobility voluntarily. A county's pro-social character and the duration of shelter -in-place order should be considered when designing COVID-19 mitigation policies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Aktay A, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2004.04145
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7-8R7
[3]   Scaling of prosocial behavior in cities [J].
Arbesman, Samuel ;
Christakis, Nicholas A. .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2011, 390 (11) :2155-2159
[4]  
Bai J. J., 2020, IMPACT SOCIAL CAPITA, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3609001, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3609001]
[5]   COUNTY-LEVEL DETERMINANTS OF SOCIAL DISTANCING (OR LACK THEREOF) DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC [J].
Baradaran Motie, Golnaz ;
Biolsi, Christopher .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2021, 39 (02) :264-279
[6]   Civic capital and social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic [J].
Barrios, John M. ;
Benmelech, Efraim ;
Hochberg, Yael V. ;
Sapienza, Paola ;
Zingales, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2021, 193
[7]   What the World Needs Now: An Intervention for Promoting Prosocial Behavior [J].
Baumsteiger, Rachel .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 41 (04) :215-229
[8]   Ideas, norms, and culture in political analysis [J].
Berman, S .
COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2001, 33 (02) :231-+
[10]   Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19 [J].
Bonaccorsi, Giovanni ;
Pierri, Francesco ;
Cinelli, Matteo ;
Flori, Andrea ;
Galeazzi, Alessandro ;
Porcelli, Francesco ;
Schmidt, Ana Lucia ;
Valensise, Carlo Michele ;
Scala, Antonio ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter ;
Pammolli, Fabio .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (27) :15530-15535