Revisiting individual and group differences in thermal comfort based on ASHRAE database

被引:74
|
作者
Wang, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
He, Yingdong [1 ]
Luo, Maohui [1 ]
Li, Ziwei [3 ]
Hong, Tianzhen [2 ]
Lin, Borong [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Ctr Built Environm, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Bldg Technol & Urban Syst Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Thermal comfort; Individual difference; Group difference; Adaptive thermal comfort; Ashrae global thermal comfort database; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; INDOOR ENVIRONMENT; TEMPERATURE; RESPONSES; OCCUPANTS; HOT; SATISFACTION; ADAPTATION; PERCEPTION; SENSATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Different thermal demands and preferences between individuals lead to a low occupant satisfaction rate, despite the high energy consumption by HVAC system. This study aims to quantify the difference in thermal demands, and to compare the influential factors which might lead to those differences. With the recently released ASHRAE Database, we quantitatively answered the following two research questions: which factors would lead to marked individual difference, and what the magnitude of this difference is. Linear regression has been applied to describe the macro-trend of how people feel thermally under different temperatures. Three types of factors which might lead to different thermal demands have been studied and compared in this study, i.e. individual factors, building characteristics and geographical factors. It was found that the local climate has the most marked impact on the neutral temperature, with an effect size of 3.5 degrees C; followed by country, HVAC operation mode and body built, which lead to a difference of more than 1 degrees C. In terms of the thermal sensitivity, building type and local climate are the most influential factors. Subjects in residential buildings or coming from Dry climate zone could accept 2.5 degrees C wider temperature range than those in office, education buildings or from Continental climate zone. The findings of this research could help thermal comfort researchers and designers to identify influential factors that might lead to individual difference, and could shed light on the feature selection for the development of personal comfort models. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II
    Licina, Veronika Foldvary
    Cheung, Toby
    Zhang, Hui
    de Dear, Richard
    Parkinson, Thomas
    Arens, Edward
    Chun, Chungyoon
    Schiavon, Stefano
    Luo, Maohui
    Brager, Gail
    Li, Peixian
    Kaam, Soazig
    Adebamowo, Michael A.
    Andamon, Mary Myla
    Babich, Francesco
    Bouden, Chiheb
    Bukovianska, Hana
    Candido, Christhina
    Cao, Bin
    Carlucci, Salvatore
    Cheong, David K. W.
    Choi, Joon-Ho
    Cook, Malcolm
    Cropper, Paul
    Deuble, Max
    Heidari, Shahin
    Indraganti, Madhavi
    Jin, Quan
    Kim, Hyojin
    Kim, Jungsoo
    Konis, Kyle
    Singh, Manoj K.
    Kwok, Alison
    Lamberts, Roberto
    Loveday, Dennis
    Langevin, Jared
    Manuz, Sanyogita
    Moosmann, Cornelia
    Nicol, Fergus
    Ooka, Ryozo
    Oseland, Nigel A.
    Pagliano, Lorenzo
    Petras, Dusan
    Rawal, Rajan
    Romero, Ramona
    Rijal, Horn Bahadur
    Sekhar, Chandra
    Schweiker, Marcel
    Tartarini, Federico
    Tanabe, Shin-ichi
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 142 : 502 - 512
  • [2] Analysis of outlier detection rules based on the ASHRAE global thermal comfort database
    Zhang, Shaoxing
    Yao, Runming
    Du, Chenqiu
    Essah, Emmanuel
    Li, Baizhan
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 234
  • [3] Dimension analysis of subjective thermal comfort metrics based on ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database using machine learning
    Wang, Zhe
    Wang, Jingyi
    He, Yueer
    Liu, Yanchen
    Lin, Borong
    Hong, Tianzhen
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2020, 29 (29):
  • [4] Thermal comfort conditions in Brazil: A discriminant analysis through the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II
    Niza, Iasmin Lourenco
    Broday, Evandro Eduardo
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 221
  • [5] Modified predicted mean vote models for human thermal comfort: An ASHRAE database-based evaluation
    Li, Han
    Hu, Haiyu
    Wu, Zhiyao
    Kong, Xiangfei
    Fan, Man
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 209
  • [6] ASHRAE's History With Thermal Comfort
    Olesen, Bjarne W.
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (11) : 32 - 39
  • [7] COMPUTING OUTDOOR COMFORT BASED ON CBE THERMAL COMFORT CALCULATION FOR ASHRAE-55
    Hatefnia, Navid
    Ghobad, Marjan
    COMPUTATIONAL ECOLOGIES: DESIGN IN THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2015, : 370 - 379
  • [8] ASHRAE RESEARCH ON THERMAL COMFORT - A PHYSIOLOGISTS VIEW
    GAGGE, AP
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 1971, 13 (02): : 60 - &
  • [9] Comparing machine learning algorithms in predicting thermal sensation using ASHRAE Comfort Database II
    Luo, Maohui
    Xie, Jiaqing
    Yan, Yichen
    Ke, Zhihao
    Yu, Peiran
    Wang, Zi
    Zhang, Jingsi
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 210
  • [10] Analysis of the accuracy on PMV - PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II
    Cheung, Toby
    Schiavon, Stefano
    Parkinson, Thomas
    Li, Peixian
    Brager, Gail
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 153 : 205 - 217