Delayed breast reconstruction with implants after invasive breast cancer does not impair prognosis

被引:24
作者
Holmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz [1 ,2 ]
During, Maria [3 ]
Henriksen, Trine Foged [1 ,2 ]
Krag, Christen [1 ]
Tange, Ulla Brix [4 ]
Kjoller, Kim [2 ]
McLaughlin, Joseph K. [5 ,6 ]
Olsen, Dorgen H.
Friis, Soren [2 ]
机构
[1] Herlev Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Danish Canc Soc, Inst Canc Epidemiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Rigshosp, DBCG Secretariat, Danish Breast Canc Cooperat Grp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Int Epidemiol Inst, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; breast implant; survival; disease-free survival; mortality; radiation therapy;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0b013e31814fba15
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We investigated if delayed breast implant reconstruction after breast cancer impairs prognosis. Using data from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group register, we identified all women <70 years who underwent breast reconstruction with implants after mastectomy after invasive breast cancer during 1978 to 1992, on average 2.2 years (range, 3 days-9.4 years) after mastectomy. The reconstructed women were closely matched to breast cancer patients without reconstruction on age and calendar time of diagnosis, tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, and adjuvant radiation therapy. Overall, 580 reconstructed women and 1158 individually matched controls were followed-up for disease-free survival within the first 10 years and for overall survival for an average of 20.1 year (range, 12.8-27.5 years). Disease-free survival was significantly improved hazard ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.95 and overall survival was nonsignificantly improved (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.06) among the breast reconstructed women. This is likely because of differences in socioeconomic and health factors.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Fallowfield, L ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (15) :1938-1943
[3]   The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors [J].
Alderman, AK ;
McMahon, L ;
Wilkins, EG .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (02) :695-703
[4]   DANISH-BREAST-CANCER-COOPERATIVE-GROUP (DBCG) - A DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTER OF THE NATION-WIDE PROGRAM FOR PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER [J].
ANDERSEN, KW ;
MOURIDSEN, HT .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1988, 27 (6A) :627-647
[5]   A critical analysis of UK public health policies in relation to diet and nutrition in low-income households [J].
Attree, Pamela .
MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2006, 2 (02) :67-78
[6]   Utilization and regional variation of breast reconstruction in Canada [J].
Baxter, N ;
Goel, V ;
Semple, JL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (01) :338-339
[7]   A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result [J].
Brandberg, Y ;
Malm, M ;
Blomqvist, L .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (01) :66-74
[8]  
Breiting VB, 2004, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V114, P217, DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000128823.77637.8A
[9]   Breast cancer following augmentation mammoplasty (United States) [J].
Brinton L.A. ;
Lubin J.H. ;
Burich M.C. ;
Colton T. ;
Brown S.L. ;
Hoover R.N. .
Cancer Causes & Control, 2000, 11 (9) :819-827
[10]   The relation between socioeconomic and demographic factors and tumour stage in women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark, 1983-1999 [J].
Dalton, S. O. ;
During, M. ;
Ross, L. ;
Carlsen, K. ;
Mortensen, P. B. ;
Lynch, J. ;
Johansen, C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 95 (05) :653-659