Reflection and Learning: Characteristics, obstacles, and implications

被引:33
作者
Denton, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Pacific Univ, Sch Educ, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
reflection; metacognition; formative assessment; depth; Socrates; Habermas; JUDGMENT; THINKING;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00600.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Reflection represents an important form of human thought; from ancient to modern times, the human capacity for reflective thinking has held the imagination of various philosophers and educational theorists. Despite this interest, researchers define reflection in different ways. One of the purposes of this article is to explore the activity of reflection by examining characteristics and contextual factors associated with it. For this purpose, various philosophical and theoretical sources are considered including Socrates, Rousseau, and Bruner, among others. Following this, empirical research is examined to determine whether elements associated with reflection are consistently integrated within regular classroom instruction. Next, practical and theoretical obstacles to reflection are proposed. One of these obstacles is an over-emphasis on the technical interest, a concept described by Jurgen Habermas. Last, some implications are suggested with regard to the use of reflection as a construct for infusing new points of discussion in teacher education and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 852
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Aesop, 1992, Aesop's Fables
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, LIFE CLASSROOMS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, WE THINK
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, SCI ALL AM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, DEMOCRACY ED
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COLL TEACH
[7]  
Bell B, 2001, SCI EDUC, V85, P536, DOI 10.1002/sce.1022.abs
[8]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, V5, P7, DOI [10.1080/0969595980050102, DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102]
[9]  
Bobbitt F., 2004, CURRICULUM STUDIES R, P9
[10]  
Bolinger K., 2007, INT J SOCIAL ED, V22, P68