Extrapolating theoretical efficacy of inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccine from human immunogenicity studies

被引:6
作者
Feldstein, Leora R. [1 ,2 ]
Matrajt, Laura [2 ,3 ]
Halloran, M. Elizabeth [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Keitel, Wendy A. [5 ,6 ]
Longini, Ira M., Jr. [3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington Sch, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Vaccine & Infect Dis Div, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Ctr Inference & Dynam Infect Dis, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Mol Virol & Microbiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Avian influenza; Influenza; Vaccine efficacy; Vaccines; Pandemic influenza; PANDEMIC INFLUENZA; ANTIBODY-TITERS; MF59; ADJUVANT; H5N1; VACCINE; A H1N1; SAFETY; PROTECTION; INFECTION; IMMUNE; HALF;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.067
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 has been a public health concern for almost 20 years due to its potential ability to become transmissible among humans. Phase I and II clinical trials have assessed safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines. A shortage of vaccine is likely to occur during the first months of a pandemic. Hence, determining whether to give one dose to more people or two doses to fewer people to best protect the population is essential. We use hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titers as an immune correlate for avian influenza vaccines. Using an established relationship to obtain a theoretical vaccine efficacy from immunogenicity data from thirteen arms of six phase I and phase II clinical trials of inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines, we assessed: (1) the proportion of theoretical vaccine efficacy achieved after a single dose (defined as primary response level), and (2) whether theoretical efficacy increases after a second dose, with and without adjuvant. Participants receiving vaccine with AS03 adjuvant had higher primary response levels (range: 0.48-0.57) compared to participants receiving vaccine with MF59 adjuvant (range: 0.32-0.47), with no observed trends in primary response levels by antigen dosage. After the first and second doses, vaccine with AS03 at dosage levels 3.75, 7.5 and 15 mcg had the highest estimated theoretical vaccine efficacy: Dose (1) 45% (95% CI: 36-57%), 53% (95% CI: 42-63%) and 55% (95% CI: 44-64%), respectively and Dose (2) 93% (95% CI: 89-96%), 97% (95% CI: 95-98%) and 97% (95% CI: 96-100%), respectively. On average, the estimated theoretical vaccine efficacy of lower dose adjuvanted vaccines (AS03 and MF59) was 17% higher than that of higher dose unadjuvanted vaccines, suggesting that including an adjuvant is dose-sparing. These data indicate adjuvanted inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccine produces high theoretical efficacy after two doses to protect individuals against a potential avian influenza pandemic. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3796 / 3802
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] ANDERSON R M, 1991
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, GUID IND CLIN DAT NE
  • [3] Immunogenicity of Avian Influenza A/Anhui/01/2005(H5N1) Vaccine With MF59 Adjuvant A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Belshe, Robert B.
    Frey, Sharon E.
    Graham, Irene L.
    Anderson, Edwin L.
    Jackson, Lisa A.
    Spearman, Paul
    Edupuganti, Srilatha
    Mulligan, Mark J.
    Rouphael, Nadine
    Winokur, Patricia
    Dolor, Rowena J.
    Woods, Christopher W.
    Walter, Emmanuel B.
    Chen, Wilbur H.
    Turley, Christine
    Edwards, Kathryn M.
    Creech, C. Buddy
    Hill, Heather
    Bellamy, Abbie R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (14): : 1420 - 1428
  • [4] Safety and Immunogenicity of Influenza A H5 Subunit Vaccines: Effect of Vaccine Schedule and Antigenic Variant
    Belshe, Robert B.
    Frey, Sharon E.
    Graham, Irene
    Mulligan, Mark J.
    Edupuganti, Srilatha
    Jackson, Lisa A.
    Wald, Anna
    Poland, Gregory
    Jacobson, Robert
    Keyserling, Harry L.
    Spearman, Paul
    Hill, Heather
    Wolff, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 203 (05) : 666 - 673
  • [5] Effects of adjuvants on the safety and immunogenicity of an avian influenza H5N1 vaccine in adults
    Bernstein, David I.
    Edwards, Kathryn M.
    Dekker, Cornelia L.
    Belshe, Robert
    Talbot, Helen K. B.
    Graham, Irene L.
    Noah, Diana L.
    He, Fenhua
    Hill, Heather
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 197 (05) : 667 - 675
  • [6] Planning for the Control of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Los Angeles County and the United States
    Chao, Dennis L.
    Matrajt, Laura
    Basta, Nicole E.
    Sugimoto, Jonathan D.
    Dean, Brandon
    Bagwell, Dee Ann
    Oiulfstad, Brit
    Halloran, M. Elizabeth
    Longini, Ira M., Jr.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 (10) : 1121 - 1130
  • [7] Chen W.-T., 2014, GSTF INT J CHEM SCI, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/0FID/0FU091
  • [8] Antibody Correlates and Predictors of Immunity to Naturally Occurring Influenza in Humans and the Importance of Antibody to the Neuraminidase
    Couch, Robert B.
    Atmar, Robert L.
    Franco, Luis M.
    Quarles, John M.
    Wells, Janet
    Arden, Nancy
    Nino, Diane
    Belmont, John W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 207 (06) : 974 - 981
  • [9] Relationship between haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody titres and clinical protection against influenza: development and application of a bayesian random-effects model
    Coudeville, Laurent
    Bailleux, Fabrice
    Riche, Benjamin
    Megas, Francoise
    Andre, Philippe
    Ecochard, Rene
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
  • [10] Czajka H, 2012, J Prev Med Hyg, V53, P136