Complexity Assessment of Sphere Decoding Methods for MIMO Detection

被引:8
作者
Fink, Johannes [1 ]
Roger, Sandra [1 ]
Gonzalez, Alberto [1 ]
Almenar, Vicenc [1 ]
Garcia, Victor M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Telecomunicac & Aplicac Multimedia, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Sistemas Informat & Comput, Valencia, Spain
来源
2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ISSPIT 2009) | 2009年
关键词
LATTICE;
D O I
10.1109/ISSPIT.2009.5407544
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Sphere Decoding (SD) algorithms have been shown to provide maximum likelihood (ML) detection over Gaussian multiple input-multiple output (MIMO) channels with lower complexity than the exhaustive search. These methods are based on a closest lattice point search over a limited search space (hypersphere). There exist several implementations of these algorithms pursuiting different search strategies and working either within a set of real numbers, thus called Real Sphere Decoders (RSD), or performing the search directly within a set of complex numbers, commonly known as Complex Sphere Decoders (CSD). In this paper: a performance comparison between the real and the complex version of the Schnorr-Euchner (SE) sphere decoder has been carried out in order to find out which algorithm is the most suitable depending on the application. Furthermore a recently appeared fixed-complexity version of the SE decoder (FSD) has been evaluated both in terms of complexity and performance and the results have been compared with the original version. In contrast to yet existing complexity analyses, not only the number of visited nodes has been investigated but also the total number of operations.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Fixing the complexity of the sphere decoder for MIMO detection [J].
Barbero, Luis G. ;
Thompson, John S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 7 (06) :2131-2142
[2]  
FINCKE U, 1985, MATH COMPUT, V44, P463, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1985-0777278-8
[3]   On the sphere-decoding algorithm I. Expected complexity [J].
Hassibi, B ;
Vikalo, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2005, 53 (08) :2806-2818
[4]   QUICKSORT [J].
HOARE, CAR .
COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1962, 5 (01) :10-&
[5]   Achieving near-capacity on a multiple-antenna channel [J].
Hochwald, BM ;
ten Brink, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2003, 51 (03) :389-399
[6]   On the complexity of sphere decoding in digital communications. [J].
Jaldén, J ;
Ottersten, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2005, 53 (04) :1474-1484
[7]  
KAILATH T, 2006, MIMO RECEIVE ALGORIT
[8]   An overview of MIMO communications -: A key to gigabit wireless [J].
Paulraj, AJ ;
Gore, DA ;
Nabar, RU ;
Bölcskei, H .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2004, 92 (02) :198-218
[9]   LATTICE BASIS REDUCTION - IMPROVED PRACTICAL ALGORITHMS AND SOLVING SUBSET SUM PROBLEMS [J].
SCHNORR, CP ;
EUCHNER, M .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1994, 66 (02) :181-199