Using Adaptive Capacity to Shift Absorptive Capacity: A Framework of Water Reallocation in Highly Modified Rivers

被引:2
作者
Rudberg, Peter M. [1 ,2 ]
Karpouzoglou, Timos [3 ]
机构
[1] GeoViable, Cordoba 14940, Spain
[2] Stockholm Environm Inst, S-11523 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Div Hist Sci Technol & Environm, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
social-hydrological resilience; water resilience; socio-hydrology; adaptive governance; hydropower; riverine ecosystem; electric system; Sweden; ALTERED FLOW REGIMES; CAUSAL MECHANISMS; GOVERNANCE; RESILIENCE; BIODIVERSITY; HYDROPOWER; MANAGEMENT; RESTORATION; PRINCIPLES; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.3390/w14020193
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Damming and water regulation creates highly modified rivers with limited ecosystem integrity and resilience. This, coupled with an ongoing global biodiversity crisis, makes river restoration a priority, which requires water reallocation. Coupled human-natural systems research provides a suitable lens for integrated systems' analysis but offers limited insight into the governance processes of water reallocation. Therefore, we propose an analytical framework, which combines insight from social-hydrological resilience and water reallocation research, and identifies the adaptive capacity in highly modified rivers as the capacity for water reallocation. We test the framework by conducting an analysis of Sweden, pre- and post-2019, a critical juncture in the governance of the country's hydropower producing rivers. We identify a relative increase in adaptive capacity post- 2019 since water reallocation is set to occur in smaller rivers and tributaries, while leaving large-scaled rivers to enjoy limited water reallocation, or even increased allocation to hydropower. We contend that the proposed framework is broad enough to be of general interest, yet sufficiently specific to contribute to the construction of middle-range theories, which could further our understanding of why and how governance processes function, change, and lead to outcomes in terms of modified natural resource management and resilience shifts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ENERGIMYNDIGHE UNPUB
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ER 2016:11
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk
[4]  
Armitage D, 2010, SPRINGER SER ENV MAN, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4
[5]  
Baird J., 2021, Water Resilience: Management and Governance in Times of Change
[6]   Optimisation as a process for understanding and managing river ecosystems [J].
Barbour, E. J. ;
Holz, L. ;
Kuczera, G. ;
Pollino, C. A. ;
Jakeman, A. J. ;
Loucks, D. P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 83 :167-178
[7]   Tradeoff between economic and environmental costs and benefits of hydropower production at run-of-river-diversion schemes under different environmental flows scenarios [J].
Bejarano, M. D. ;
Sordo-Ward, A. ;
Gabriel-Martin, I ;
Garrote, L. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 572 :790-804
[8]   The effects of hydropeaking on riverine plants: a review [J].
Bejarano, Maria D. ;
Jansson, Roland ;
Nilsson, Christer .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2018, 93 (01) :658-673
[9]  
Bergsten P., 2011, VATTENFALL POWER CON
[10]   Battling the Extreme: A Study on the Power System Resilience [J].
Bie, Zhaohong ;
Lin, Yanling ;
Li, Gengfeng ;
Li, Furong .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2017, 105 (07) :1253-1266