Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities

被引:69
作者
Jensen, TK
Slama, R
Ducot, B
Suominen, J
Cawood, EHH
Andersen, AG
Eustache, F
Irvine, S
Auger, S
Jouannet, P
Vierula, M
Jorgensen, N
Toppari, J
Skakkebaek, NE
Keiding, N
Spira, A
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Juliane Marie Ctr, Sect GR5064, Dept Growth & Reprod, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] St Marys Hosp, Imperial Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London W2 1PG, England
[3] Hop Bicetre, INSERM, U292, FR-94276 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[4] Univ Turku, Inst Biomed, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[5] Ctr Reprod Biol, MRC, Reprod Biol Unit, Edinburgh EH3 9ET, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Univ Paris 05, Grp Hosp Cochin, FR-75014 Paris, France
[7] Univ Turku, Dept Physiol, Turku, Finland
[8] Univ Turku, Dept Paediat, Turku, Finland
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
environmental health; fertility; population surveillance; pregnancy rate; time factors;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/16.12.2697
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: A previous European study found a longer time to pregnancy (TTP) among fertile women from Paris compared with women from other Western European countries. A co-ordinated, cross-sectional study of pregnant couples from Denmark (Copenhagen), France (Paris), Scotland (Edinburgh) and Finland (Turku) was therefore undertaken to assess differences in waiting TTP among couples from these cities. METHODS: Pregnant women were invited to participate when they showed up for their first antenatal visit in one of the four centres. Inclusion criteria included that their partner was 20-45 years of age and born in the country in which he was currently living and that the pregnancy was achieved without fertility treatment. Both partners filled in a questionnaire and the man underwent a physical examination and delivered a semen sample (Turku: n = 237, Copenhagen: n = 302, Edinburgh: n = 212, Paris: n = 191). RESULTS: French couples had a decreased probability of conception compared with couples from the other three countries, although only after adjustment for confounders. No significant differences between couples from the three other countries were found. CONCLUSION: The observed geographical differences in TTP remain unexplained and were not due to differences in semen quality, but may be caused by varying exposures to environmental factors or psychological distress. In addition, selection bias due to the low participation rates cannot be ruled out. Future studies examining the causes for geographical differences in TTP are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2697 / 2704
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   TESTICULAR CANCER IN 9 NORTHERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES [J].
ADAMI, HO ;
BERGSTROM, R ;
MOHNER, M ;
ZATONSKI, W ;
STORM, H ;
EKBOM, A ;
TRETLI, S ;
TEPPO, L ;
ZIEGLER, H ;
RAHU, M ;
GUREVICIUS, R ;
STENGREVICS, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 59 (01) :33-38
[2]  
ANSELL PE, 1992, ARCH DIS CHILD, V67, P892, DOI DOI 10.1136/ADC.67.7.892
[3]   Evidence for regional differences of semen quality among fertile French men [J].
Auger, J ;
Jouannet, P .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (04) :740-745
[4]   DECLINE IN SEMEN QUALITY AMONG FERTILE MEN IN PARIS DURING THE PAST 20 YEARS [J].
AUGER, J ;
KUNSTMANN, JM ;
CZYGLIK, F ;
JOUANNET, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (05) :281-285
[5]   CIGARETTE-SMOKING ASSOCIATED WITH DELAYED CONCEPTION [J].
BAIRD, DD ;
WILCOX, AJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 253 (20) :2979-2983
[6]  
Berling S, 1997, HUM REPROD, V12, P1002
[7]   Relation between semen quality and fertility:: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners [J].
Bonde, JPE ;
Ernst, E ;
Jensen, TK ;
Hjollund, NHI ;
Kolstad, H ;
Henriksen, TB ;
Scheike, T ;
Giwercman, A ;
Olsen, J ;
Skakkebæk, NE .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9135) :1172-1177
[8]  
BOSTOFTE E, 1983, INT J FERTIL, V28, P91
[9]  
BRACKEN MB, 1990, FERTIL STERIL, V53, P21
[10]   Time series analysis of sperm concentration in fertile men in Toulouse, France between 1977 and 1992 [J].
Bujan, L ;
Mansat, A ;
Pontonnier, F ;
Mieusset, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7029) :471-472