Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19

被引:8
作者
Lai, Fan [1 ]
Li, Xin [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Luo, Yingjuan [1 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Huang, Xiuhua [1 ]
Zhang, Jiajia [1 ]
Peng, Jieru [1 ]
Wang, Qin [1 ]
Fan, Li [1 ]
Li, Wen [1 ]
Huo, Junrong [1 ]
Liu, Tianjiao [1 ]
Li, Yalan [2 ]
Lin, Yonghong [1 ]
Yang, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Womens & Childrens Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Peoples Hosp Chengdu 4, Sch Med, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
关键词
COVID-19; epidemiology; fever; infrared rays; mass screening; TEMPERATURE-MEASUREMENT; BODY-TEMPERATURE; AXILLARY; CARE;
D O I
10.2147/RMHP.S357567
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Fever is one of the most typical clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are commonly used to screen for fever. However, there is a lack of authoritative data to define a "fever" when an NCIT is used and previous studies have shown that NCIT readings fluctuate widely depending on ambient temperatures and the body surface site screened. The aim of this study was to establish cut-off points for normal temperatures of different body sites (neck, forehead, temples, and wrist) and investigate the accuracy of NCITs at various ambient temperatures to improve the standardization and accuracy of fever screening. Patients and Methods: A prospective investigation was conducted among 904 participants in the outpatient and emergency departments of Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. Body temperature was measured using NCITs and mercury axillary thermometers. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the accuracy of body temperature detection at the four body surface sites. Data on participant characteristics were also collected. Results: Among the four surface sites, the neck temperature detection group had the highest accuracy. When the neck temperature was 37.35 degrees C as the optimum fever diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity was 0.866. The optimum fever diagnostic thresholds for forehead, temporal, and wrist temperature were 36.65 degrees C, 36.65 degrees C, and 36.75 degrees C, respectively. Moreover, triple neck temperature detection had the highest sensitivity, up to 0.998, whereas the sensitivity of triple wrist temperature detections was 0.949. Notably, the accuracy of NCITs significantly reduced when the temperature was lower than 18 degrees C. Conclusion: Neck temperature had the highest accuracy among the four NCIT temperature measurement sites, with an optimum fever diagnostic threshold of 37.35 degrees C. Considering the findings reported in our study, we recommend triple neck temperature detection with NCITs as the fever screening standard for COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 456
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of non-contact infrared thermometers and thermal scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aggarwal, Nishant
    Garg, Mohil
    Dwarakanathan, Vignesh
    Gautam, Nitesh
    Kumar, Swasthi S.
    Jadon, Ranveer Singh
    Gupta, Mohak
    Ray, Animesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (08)
  • [2] Ai J, EMERG MICROBES INFEC, V2021, P1, DOI [10.1080/22221751.2020.1868951, DOI 10.1080/22221751.2020.1868951]
  • [3] Evaluation of indoor hospital acclimatization of body temperature before COVID-19 fever screening
    Bassi, A.
    Henry, B. M.
    Pighi, L.
    Leone, L.
    Lippi, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2021, 112 : 127 - 128
  • [4] Bitar D, 2009, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V14
  • [5] Face and eyes localization algorithm in thermal images for temperature measurement of the inner canthus of the eyes
    Budzan, Sebastian
    Wyzgolik, Roman
    [J]. INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 60 : 225 - 234
  • [6] Return to school in the COVID-19 era: considerations for temperature measurement
    Buoite Stella A.
    Manganotti P.
    Furlanis G.
    Accardo A.
    Ajčević M.
    [J]. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 2020, 44 (08) : 468 - 471
  • [7] Considerations and a call to action for the use of noncontact forehead infrared handheld thermometers during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Chan, Wing P.
    Kosik, Russell Oliver
    Wang, C. Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 11 : 1 - 3
  • [8] Chen G, 2020, IRAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V49, P57, DOI 10.18502/ijph.v49iS1.3670
  • [9] Investigation of the Impact of Infrared Sensors on Core Body Temperature Monitoring by Comparing Measurement Sites
    Chen, Hsuan-Yu
    Chen, Andrew
    Chen, Chiachung
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (10)
  • [10] Use of non-contact infrared thermometers in rehabilitation patients: a randomized controlled study
    Chen, Zhen
    Wang, Hui
    Wang, Yi
    Lin, Hongmei
    Zhu, Xiuping
    Wang, Yaqin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (01)