Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Block Provides Adequate Analgesia During Urgent Endovascular Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia with Resting Pain

被引:15
作者
Tureli, Derya [1 ]
Deniz, Sinan [1 ]
Unlukaplan, Aytekin [2 ]
Oguzkurt, Levent [1 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Girisimsel Radyol Bolumu, Davutpasa C 4, TR-34010 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Koc Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Critical limb ischemia; Sciatic nerve block; Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia; Urgent endovascular treatment; Visual analog scale; LOCAL-ANESTHETIC VOLUMES; NERVE BLOCK; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; GUIDANCE; ED99;
D O I
10.1007/s00270-017-1802-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To demonstrate feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block for providing analgesia during urgent endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia with resting pain. Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic blocks were performed by an interventional radiologist in angiography suite immediately prior to commencement of urgent endovascular treatment of 30 critical limb ischemia patients. Subjective pain levels prior to and following sciatic block were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Need for any supplemental anxiolytics or analgesics during treatment was recorded. Post-procedural evaluation of patient and operator satisfaction levels regarding the intervention was also documented. Ultrasound-guided sciatic block provided adequate analgesia in all patients; VAS scores were 0 (no pain) in 87% and 1-3 (mild to annoying pain) in 13%. Two patients required anxiolytic premedication. Additional analgesia was not required during course of endovascular treatment of any patients. Time necessary to perform sciatic block ranged 3-9 (mean 5.9 +/- 1.3) min. Median number of needle attempts was 1 (range 1-3). Onset of satisfactory block ranged from 5 to 20 min (mean 9.4 +/- 2.6 min). Mean treatment time was 102.2 +/- 36.7 min, and balloon time was 22.4 +/- 6.1 min. Patient and operator satisfaction with pain control were very good in all cases. There were no procedure-related complications. Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic block is a feasible and safe alternative for providing adequate analgesia during urgent endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia with resting pain. Level 4, case series.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 48
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Minimum effective local anesthetic volume for surgical anesthesia by subparaneural, ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block: A prospective dose-finding study [J].
Bang, Seung Uk ;
Kim, Dong Ju ;
Bae, Jin Ho ;
Chung, Kyudon ;
Kim, Yeesuk .
MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (34)
[2]   Ultrasound Guidance Improves a Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block When Compared With Nerve Stimulation [J].
Bendtsen, Thomas F. ;
Nielsen, Thomas D. ;
Rohde, Claus V. ;
Kibak, Kristian ;
Linde, Frank .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 36 (02) :181-184
[3]   Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block [J].
Danelli, G. ;
Fanelli, A. ;
Ghisi, D. ;
Moschini, E. ;
Rossi, M. ;
Ortu, A. ;
Baciarello, M. ;
Fanelli, G. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (06) :638-642
[4]   Combined ultrasound and neurostimulation guidance for popliteal sciatic nerve block:: A prospective, randomized comparison with neurostimulation alone [J].
Dufour, Eric ;
Quennesson, Patrick ;
Van Robais, Anne Laure ;
Ledon, Francoise ;
Laloe, Pierre-Antoine ;
Liu, Ngai ;
Fischler, Marc .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (05) :1553-1558
[5]   Likert scales: how to (ab)use them [J].
Jamieson, S .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (12) :1217-1218
[6]   A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Landmark-Based Approaches to Saphenous Nerve Blockade: A Prospective, Controlled, Blinded, Crossover Trial [J].
Kent, Michael L. ;
Hackworth, Robert J. ;
Riffenburgh, Robert. H. ;
Kaesberg, Julie L. ;
Asseff, David C. ;
Lujan, Eugenio ;
Corey, John M. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 117 (01) :265-270
[7]   Effective local anaesthetic volumes for sciatic nerve blockade: a clinical evaluation of the ED99 [J].
Keplinger, M. ;
Marhofer, P. ;
Marhofer, D. ;
Schroegendorfer, K. ;
Haslik, W. ;
Zeitlinger, M. ;
Mayer, C. V. ;
Kettner, S. C. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 (05) :585-590
[8]   Minimal local anaesthetic volumes for sciatic nerve block: evaluation of ED99 in volunteers [J].
Latzke, D. ;
Marhofer, P. ;
Zeitlinger, M. ;
Machata, A. ;
Neumann, F. ;
Lackner, E. ;
Kettner, S. C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (02) :239-244
[9]  
Lehman MA, HDB INTERVENTIONAL R
[10]   A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Liu, SS ;
Strodtbeck, WM ;
Richman, JM ;
Wu, CL .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (06) :1634-1642