Comparative study of workplace policy and practices contributing to disability nondiscrimination

被引:55
作者
Bruyère, SM [1 ]
Erickson, WA [1 ]
VanLooy, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Ind & Labor Relat Extens Div, Program Employment & Disabil, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0090-5550.49.1.28
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of disability nondiscrimination legislation on employer practices in the United States and the United Kingdom. Study Design: U.S. and U.K. human resource professionals were surveyed about their experience with implementation of the legislation. Results: Both U.S. and U.K. employers are responding to their respective legislation by making accommodations-adjustments needed by applicants and employees with disabilities. Conclusions: Rehabilitation psychologists and other health care professionals working with people with disabilities must understand employee rights and employer responsibilities under this legislation, know where employers may have difficulty in responding to an accommodation request, and be familiar with the existing workplace resources and processes that can support an effective response to such requests.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 38
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Bruyere S., 2000, Disability employment policies and practices in private and federal sector organizations
[2]  
BRUYERE S, 2000, EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, V92, P26
[3]  
*BUR BAT AFF, 2001, B MAN S 2, V52, pS1
[4]  
Burkhauser R., 1998, ECON REV, V2, P17
[5]  
BURKHAUSER RV, 2001, EC OUTCOMES WORKING
[6]  
FLOYD M, 1997, DISABILITY REHABILIT, V6
[7]  
Hodges-Aeberhard Jane, 1997, Affirmative Action in the Employment of Ethnic Minorities and Persons with Disabilities
[8]   How comparative is comparative research? [J].
Jowell, R .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1998, 42 (02) :168-177
[9]  
*MIN DIS PEOPL, 1995, PUBL DL MIN DIS PEOP, V40
[10]  
NOWAK S, 1989, ASA PRES S, P34