Processing Scalar Implicature: A Constraint-Based Approach

被引:116
作者
Degen, Judith [1 ]
Tanenhaus, Michael K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
关键词
Pragmatics; Scalar implicature; Quantifiers; Alternatives; SPOKEN LANGUAGE; TIME-COURSE; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12171
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Three experiments investigated the processing of the implicature associated with some using a gumball paradigm. On each trial, participants saw an image of a gumball machine with an upper chamber with 13 gumballs and an empty lower chamber. Gumballs then dropped to the lower chamber and participants evaluated statements, such as You got some of the gumballs. Experiment 1 established that some is less natural for reference to small sets (1, 2, and 3 of the 13 gumballs) and unpartitioned sets (all 13 gumballs) compared to intermediate sets (6-8). Partitive some of was less natural than simple some when used with the unpartitioned set. In Experiment 2, including exact number descriptions lowered naturalness ratings for some with small sets but not for intermediate size sets and the unpartitioned set. In Experiment 3, the naturalness ratings from Experiment 2 predicted response times. The results are interpreted as evidence for a Constraint-Based account of scalar implicature processing and against both two-stage, Literal-First models and pragmatic Default models.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 710
页数:44
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 27 CUNY C HUM SENT P
[2]  
[Anonymous], SEMANTICS PRAGMATICS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Speech, Language, and Communication
[4]  
[Anonymous], 23 ANN CUNY C HUM SE
[5]  
[Anonymous], AVAILABILIT IN PRESS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, P 33 ANN M COGN SCI
[7]   WHAT SOME CONCEPTS MIGHT NOT BE [J].
ARMSTRONG, SL ;
GLEITMAN, LR ;
GLEITMAN, H .
COGNITION, 1983, 13 (03) :263-308
[8]  
ATKINSON J, 1976, PERCEPTION, V5, P335, DOI 10.1068/p050335
[9]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[10]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278