Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay

被引:87
作者
Riester, Elena [1 ]
Findeisen, Peter [2 ]
Hegel, J. Kolja [3 ]
Kabesch, Michael [4 ,5 ]
Ambrosch, Andreas [6 ]
Rank, Christopher M. [7 ]
Pessl, Florina [7 ]
Laengin, Tina [7 ]
Niederhauser, Christoph [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Lab Augsburg MVZ GmbH, Augsburg, Germany
[2] MVZ Lab Limbach, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Charite Vivantes Serv GmbH, Lab Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[4] Hosp St Hedwig Order St John, Univ Childrens Hosp Regensburg KUNO, Regensburg, Germany
[5] Univ Regensburg, Univ Hosp, Regensburg, Germany
[6] Barmherzige Bruder Hosp, Inst Lab Med Microbiol & Hyg, Regensburg, Germany
[7] Roche Diagnost GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
[8] Interreg Blood Transfus Swiss Red Cross, Murtenstr 133, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland
[9] Univ Bern, Inst Infect Dis IFIK, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Spike protein; Nucleocapsid protein; Immunoassay; Antibodies; SPIKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114271
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Elecsys (R) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) has been developed for the detection of antibodies to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) spike (S) protein. We evaluated the assay performance using samples from seven sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. For specificity and sensitivity analyses, 7880 presumed negative pre-pandemic samples and 827 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed single or sequential samples from 272 different patients were tested, respectively. The overall specificity and sensitivity (>14 days post-PCR) for the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay were 99.95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 99.87-99.99; 7876/7880) and 97.92% (95% CI: 95.21-99.32; 235/240), respectively. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay had significantly higher specificity compared with the LIAISON (R) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (99.95% [2032/2033] vs 98.82% [2009/ 2033]), ADVIA Centaur (R) SARS-CoV-2 Total (100% [928/928] vs 86.96% [807/928]), ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG (99.97% [2931/2932] vs 99.69% [2923/2932]), iFlash-SARS-CoV-2 IgM (100.00% [928/928] vs 99.57% [924/928]), and EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (100.00% [903/903] vs 97.45% [880/903]) and IgA (100.00% [895/895] vs 95.75% [857/895]) assays. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay had significantly higher sensitivity (>14 days post-PCR) compared with the ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG (98.70% [76/77] vs 87.01% [67/77]), iFlash-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (100.00% [76/76] vs 93.42% [71/76]) and IgM (100.00% [76/76] vs 35.53% [27/76]), and EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (98.26% [113/115] vs 93.91% [108/ 115]) assays. Therefore, the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay demonstrated a reliable performance across various sample populations for the detection of anti-S antibodies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Abbott, 2021, SARS COV 2 IGG ASS M
[2]   Sensitivity in Detection of Antibodies to Nucleocapsid and Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 [J].
Burbelo, Peter D. ;
Riedo, Francis X. ;
Morishima, Chihiro ;
Rawlings, Stephen ;
Smith, Davey ;
Das, Sanchita ;
Strich, Jeffrey R. ;
Chertow, Daniel S. ;
Davey, Richard T., Jr. ;
Cohen, Jeffrey, I .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 222 (02) :206-213
[3]   Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is extremely vivacious in subjects with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [J].
Callegaro, Annapaola ;
Borleri, Daniela ;
Farina, Claudio ;
Napolitano, Gavino ;
Valenti, Daniela ;
Rizzi, Marco ;
Maggiolo, Franco .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (07) :4612-4615
[4]   Vaccination strategy and anti - SARS-CoV-2 S titers in healthcare workers of the INT - IRCCS "Fondazione Pascale" Cancer Center (Naples, Italy) [J].
Cavalcanti, Ernesta ;
Isgro, Maria Antonietta ;
Rea, Domenica ;
Di Capua, Lucia ;
Trillo, Giusy ;
Russo, Luigi ;
Botti, Gerardo ;
Miscio, Leonardo ;
Buonaguro, Franco Maria ;
Bianchi, Attilio Antonio Montano .
INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2021, 16 (01)
[5]   A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster [J].
Chan, Jasper Fuk-Woo ;
Yuan, Shuofeng ;
Kok, Kin-Hang ;
To, Kelvin Kai-Wang ;
Chu, Hin ;
Yang, Jin ;
Xing, Fanfan ;
Liu, Jieling ;
Yip, Cyril Chik-Yan ;
Poon, Rosana Wing-Shan ;
Tsoi, Hoi-Wah ;
Lo, Simon Kam-Fai ;
Chan, Kwok-Hung ;
Poon, Vincent Kwok-Man ;
Chan, Wan-Mui ;
Ip, Jonathan Daniel ;
Cai, Jian-Piao ;
Cheng, Vincent Chi-Chung ;
Chen, Honglin ;
Hui, Christopher Kim-Ming ;
Yuen, Kwok-Yung .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10223) :514-523
[6]   Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19 [J].
Dai, Lianpan ;
Gao, George F. .
NATURE REVIEWS IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 21 (02) :73-82
[7]   Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy [J].
Dashraath, Pradip ;
Wong, Jing Lin Jeslyn ;
Lim, Mei Xian Karen ;
Lim, Li Mm ;
Li, Sarah ;
Biswas, Arijit ;
Choolani, Mahesh ;
Mattar, Citra ;
Su, Lin Lin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (06) :521-531
[8]  
Dhama K, 2020, CLIN MICROBIOL REV, V33, DOI [10.1038/s41432-020-0088-4, 10.1128/CMR.00028-20]
[9]  
DiaSorin, 2020, LIAISON R SARS COV 2
[10]   Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 [J].
Ernst, Emilie ;
Wolfe, Patricia ;
Stahura, Corrine ;
Edwards, Katie A. .
TALANTA, 2021, 224