Challenges in reversing esophageal discontinuity operations

被引:41
作者
Barkley, C
Orringer, MB
Iannettoni, MD
Yee, J
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Surg Sect, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00825-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. After catastrophic esophageal or gastric disruption results in esophageal discontinuity, operations to restore swallowing are surgical challenges. Methods. A retrospective review and assessment of functional results was performed in 40 patients (average age 59.9 years) who had 42 operations to reverse esophageal discontinuity between 1973 and 2002. Results. Esophageal discontinuity resulted from gastric necrosis after esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy (n = 10) or hiatal hernia repair (n 4), esophageal perforation complicating dilatation (n 5), failed colonic or jejunal interpositions (n = 5), caustic ingestion (n = 4), Boerhaave syndrome (n = 4), esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 3), and other causes (n = 6). Eighteen patients (43.9%) required prolonged mechanical ventilation. Thirty-one (75.6%) had an end cervical esophagostomy; 6, an anterior thoracic esophagostomy; 2, lateral esophagostomy and in situ native esophagus stapled and divided distally; and 1 each, a stapled, divided esophagus without esophagostomy and a stapled undivided esophagus without esophagostomy. Twenty-six patients (63.4%) had undergone partial or total gastrectomy. Ten (24.4%) had vocal cord paralysis. Operations reestablishing continuity included colonic interposition in 23 (56.1%), substernal gastric interposition in 7 (17.1%), esophagectomy and cervical anastomosis in 6, esophageal reanastomosis in 3, staged jejunal interposition in 1, and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy in 1. There were no hospital deaths. Twenty-eight patients (68.3%) had postoperative complications. Length of stay averaged 20.6 days. Follow-up for 40 patients averaged 54.5 months. Functional results (39 patients) were excellent in 12 (30.8%), good in 15 (38.5%), fair in 10 (25.6%), and poor in 2 (5.1%). Conclusions. Successful reversal of esophageal discontinuity requires individualized assessment and ingenuity. Despite appreciable morbidity, the ultimate result is generally gratifying. (C) 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 994
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] OPTIONS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PERFORATIONS OF THE ESOPHAGUS
    BREWER, LA
    CARTER, R
    MULDER, G
    STILES, QR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 152 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [2] Esophageal perforation: Emphasis on management
    Bufkin, BL
    Miller, JI
    Mansour, KA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 61 (05) : 1447 - 1451
  • [3] Microsurgical reconstruction of the esophagus using supercharged pedicled jejunum flaps: Special indications and pitfalls
    Chana, JS
    Chen, HC
    Sharma, R
    Gedebou, TM
    Feng, GM
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 110 (03) : 742 - 748
  • [4] Esophagectomy for benign disease: Trends in surgical results and management
    Davis, EA
    Heitmiller, RF
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (02) : 369 - 372
  • [5] Long-segment substernal jejunal esophageal replacement with internal mammary vascular augmentation
    Heitmiller, RF
    Gruber, PJ
    Swier, P
    Singh, N
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2000, 13 (03) : 240 - 242
  • [6] HIRABAYASHI S, 1993, SURGERY, V113, P515
  • [7] Functional outcome after surgical treatment of esophageal perforation
    Iannettoni, MD
    Vlessis, AA
    Whyte, RI
    Orringer, MB
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (06) : 1606 - 1609
  • [8] A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 66 ESOPHAGEAL RECONSTRUCTIONS USING MICROVASCULAR ANASTOMOSES - PROBLEMS AND OUR METHODS FOR ATYPICAL CASES
    INOUE, Y
    TAI, Y
    FUJITA, H
    TANAKA, S
    MIGITA, H
    KIYOKAWA, K
    HIRANO, M
    KAKEGAWA, T
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1994, 94 (02) : 277 - 284
  • [9] ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION - A CONTINUING CHALLENGE
    JONES, WG
    GINSBERG, RJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1992, 53 (03) : 534 - 543
  • [10] LUC M, 1981, ANN SURG, V194, P57