An approach for ensuring minimum protected area size in systematic conservation planning

被引:34
作者
Smith, Robert J. [1 ]
Di Minin, Enrico [1 ]
Linke, Simon [2 ,3 ]
Segan, Daniel B. [3 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury CT2 7NR, Kent, England
[2] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Appl Environm Decis Anal, Ctr Ecol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Protected areas; Marxan; Systematic conservation planning; Viability; RESERVE NETWORKS; BIODIVERSITY; PERSISTENCE; MAPUTALAND; LANDSCAPE; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.019
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
One of the most efficient approaches for designing protected area (PA) networks is to use systematic conservation planning software. A number of software packages are available and all of them include a spatial cost or constraint component in their prioritisation algorithms, which allow the user to determine the level of fragmentation of the final PA system. Many conservation planners want to set minimum PA size thresholds, as small PAs are less viable and more expensive to manage, but this can only be achieved with existing software packages by repeatedly reducing the fragmentation levels of the PA system until every PA meets the threshold. Such an approach is inefficient because it increases the size of every PA, not just the smaller ones. Here we describe MinPatch, a software package developed to overcome this problem by manipulating outputs from the Marxan conservation planning software, so that every PA meets the user-defined size threshold. We then investigate the impacts of this approach with a dataset from the Maputaland Centre of Endemism, and find that using MinPatch to meet the PA thresholds is a much more efficient approach than using Marxan alone. We also show that setting a minimum PA threshold can have important effects on where new PAs are located when compared with Marxan outputs. Based on these results, we recommend that conservation planners use MinPatch whenever they want each PA in a network to meet a minimum size threshold. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2525 / 2531
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation
    Ando, A
    Camm, J
    Polasky, S
    Solow, A
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) : 2126 - 2128
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION
  • [3] Ball I.R., 2000, MARXAN (V1.8.2): Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing
  • [4] Ball I.R., 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION, P185, DOI DOI 10.1111/EVA.12631
  • [5] Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs
    Balmford, A
    Gaston, KJ
    Blyth, S
    James, A
    Kapos, V
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) : 1046 - 1050
  • [6] A method for setting the size of plant conservation target areas
    Burgman, MA
    Possingham, HP
    Lynch, AJJ
    Keith, DA
    McCarthy, MA
    Hopper, SD
    Drury, WL
    Passioura, JA
    Devries, RJ
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (03) : 603 - 616
  • [7] Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity
    Cabeza, M
    Moilanen, A
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (05) : 242 - 248
  • [8] *CBD, 2004, COP 7 DEC 7 28
  • [9] Planning for persistence in marine reserves: A question of catastrophic importance
    Game, Edward T.
    Watts, Matthew E.
    Wooldridge, Scott
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 18 (03) : 670 - 680
  • [10] Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system
    Jenkins, Clinton N.
    Joppa, Lucas
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (10) : 2166 - 2174