Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Aperture Femoral Fixation

被引:4
作者
Mutnal, Amar [1 ]
Leo, Brian M. [2 ]
Vargas, Luis [3 ]
Colbrunn, Robb W. [4 ]
Butler, Robert S. [5 ]
Uribe, John W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Orthoped Surg Sports Hlth, Weston, FL 33331 USA
[3] UHZ Sports Med Inst, Coral Gables, FL USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
SIMULATED MUSCLE LOADS; ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE-BUNDLE; TIBIAL INLAY; KNEE-JOINT; DEFICIENCY; TRANSLATION; INJURIES; ROTATION; FLEXION; PCL;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20150105-50
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this study was to determine whether single-tunnel-double-bundle-equivalent posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using an aperture femoral fixation device better replicated normal knee kinematics than single-bundle reconstruction. Eight fresh-frozen human cadaver knees underwent arthroscopically assisted PCL reconstruction and were examined with a robotic testing system to assess knee joint kinematics under combinations of applied internal, neutral, and external rotational tibial torque and anteroposterior translational forces at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees flexion. Three conditions were tested: (1) intact PCL; (2) single-tunnel PCL reconstruction with anterolateral and posteromedial bundle fixation at 90 degrees/90 degrees (single bundle); and (3) 90 degrees/0 degrees (double-bundle equivalent), respectively. Posterior tibial translation was the primary outcome measure. Compared with the intact knee, double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction under external tibial torque allowed greater posterior translation across the flexion arc as a whole (P=.025) and at 30 degrees flexion (P=.027) when results were stratified by flexion angle. No other kinematic differences were found with single-bundle or double-bundle-equivalent fixation, including mediolateral translation and both coupled and isolated tibial rotation (P>.05). Single-bundle PCL reconstruction closely approximated native knee rotational and translational kinematics, whereas double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction permitted increased posterior translation with applied external tibial torque, particularly at lower flexion angles. Single-bundle PCL reconstruction provides knee stability similar to the intact condition, making it a practical alternative to conventional double-bundle PCL reconstruction. The authors found that double-bundle-equivalent reconstruction provided no advantage to justify its clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Biomechanics of the PCL and related structures: posterolateral, posteromedial and meniscofemoral ligaments
    Amis, AA
    Bull, AMJ
    Gupte, CM
    Hijazi, I
    Race, A
    Robinson, JR
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2003, 11 (05) : 271 - 281
  • [2] Control of laxity in knees with combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency - Comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with modified Larson posterolateral corner reconstruction
    Apsingi, Sunil
    Nguyen, Trung
    Bull, Anthony M. J.
    Unwin, Andrew
    Deehan, David J.
    Amis, Andrew A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (03) : 487 - 494
  • [3] A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques
    Bergfeld, JA
    McAllister, DR
    Parker, RD
    Valdevit, ADC
    Kambic, HE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [4] A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques
    Bergfeld, JA
    Graham, SM
    Parker, RD
    Valdevit, ADC
    Kambic, HE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (07) : 976 - 981
  • [5] The effects of tibial rotation on posterior translation in knees in which the posterior cruciate ligament has been cut
    Bergfeld, JA
    McAllister, DR
    Parker, RD
    Valdevit, ADC
    Kambic, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (09) : 1339 - 1343
  • [6] Evaluation of in situ graft forces of a 2-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at various flexion angles
    Carson, Eric W.
    Deng, Xiang Hua
    Allen, Answorth
    Wickiewicz, Thomas
    Warren, Russell F.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (05) : 488 - 495
  • [7] Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors
    Felson, DT
    Lawrence, RC
    Dieppe, PA
    Hirsch, R
    Helmick, CG
    Jordan, JM
    Kington, RS
    Lane, NE
    Nevitt, MC
    Zhang, YQ
    Sowers, M
    McAlindon, T
    Spector, TD
    Poole, AR
    Yanovski, SZ
    Ateshian, G
    Sharma, L
    Buckwalter, JA
    Brandt, KD
    Fries, JF
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 133 (08) : 635 - 646
  • [8] AN INVITRO BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR MOTION OF THE KNEE - TIBIAL DISPLACEMENT, ROTATION, AND TORQUE
    FUKUBAYASHI, T
    TORZILLI, PA
    SHERMAN, MF
    WARREN, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1982, 64 (02) : 258 - 264
  • [9] Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics After Reconstruction of an Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury In Vivo Analysis During Lunge
    Gill, Thomas J.
    Van de Velde, Samuel K.
    Wing, David W.
    Oh, Luke S.
    Hosseini, Ali
    Li, Guoan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (12) : 2377 - 2385
  • [10] The effect of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on patellofemoral contact pressures in the knee joint under simulated muscle loads
    Gill, TJ
    DeFrate, LE
    Wang, C
    Carey, CT
    Zayontz, S
    Zarins, B
    Li, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (01) : 109 - 115