Dealing with a cluster of large centralized municipal wastewater treatment plants: A case study

被引:11
作者
De Gisi, Sabino [1 ]
Pica, Raffaele [2 ]
Casella, Patrizia [3 ]
Notarnicola, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Bari, Dept Civil Environm Land Bldg Engn & Chem DICATEC, Via E Orabona 4, I-70125 Bari, BA, Italy
[2] ENEA, Italian Natl Agcy New Technol Energy & Sustainabl, R4R Lab, USER, Via Martiri Monte Sole 4, I-40129 Bologna, BO, Italy
[3] ENEA, Italian Natl Agcy New Technol Energy & Sustainabl, Dept Sustainabil, Pzza E Fermi, I-80055 Portici, NA, Italy
关键词
Energy consumption; GHG emissions; Regi Lagni; Running costs; Sludge management; Wastewater engineering; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; RECOVERY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2018.07.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The article deals with a cluster of large centralized municipal wastewater treatment plants (LCMWWTPs) assessing the main economic, energy, environmental and management aspects. With reference to the case study of the Regi Lagni system (Southern Italy), composed of five WWTPs for an overall effective population of 2,235,800 inhabitants the study focused first on the multi-disciplinary characterization of the system investigated and then on potential future upgrading options, identifying the best suitable solution. For the scope, several indicators such as running costs, energy consumptions, Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG), waste for landfilling and two scenarios were defined. The first scenario focused on the role of anaerobic digestion while the dewatered sludge was sent to landfill. The second scenario implemented the same operations of the previous one although the construction of a thermal treatment plant for the dewatered sludge was also planned. Results showed how LCMWWTPs could be characterised by low resilience; the upgrading of plants to comply with the increasingly stringent legal limits was difficult, especially where works were carried out to ensure continuity of operation. Multi-criteria analysis allowed the cluster system based on anaerobic digestion to be the best solution from an economic, energy and environmental point of view. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 278
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Cost comparison of centralized and decentralized wastewater management systems using optimization model
    Jung, Youngmee Tiffany
    Narayanan, N. C.
    Cheng, Yu-Ling
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 213 : 90 - 97
  • [22] Kampet T, 2000, COST PLANNING BUILDI
  • [23] Using recycled water for non-potable, urban uses: a review with particular reference to toilet flushing
    Lazarova, V
    Hills, S
    Birks, R
    [J]. WATER RECYCLING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION, 2003, 3 (04): : 69 - 77
  • [24] Decision support toolkit for integrated analysis and design of reclaimed water infrastructure
    Lee, Eun Jung
    Criddle, Craig S.
    Geza, Mengistu
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    Freyberg, David. L.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2018, 134 : 234 - 252
  • [25] To centralise or to decentralise: An overview of the most recent trends in wastewater treatment management
    Libralato, Giovanni
    Ghirardini, Annamaria Volpi
    Avezzu, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 94 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [26] Lubello C, 2000, BENCHMARKING WATER S
  • [27] Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: Applicability in developing countries
    Massoud, May A.
    Tarhini, Akram
    Nasr, Joumana A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) : 652 - 659
  • [28] McCann B., 2010, Water 21, P39
  • [29] Menendez M, 2010, C N CAR SECT AM WAT
  • [30] Metcalf I.N. C., 2003, WASTEWATER ENG TREAT