The role of bioenergy for global deep decarbonization: CO2 removal or low-carbon energy?

被引:29
作者
Butnar, Isabela [1 ]
Broad, Oliver [1 ]
Rodriguez, Baltazar Solano [1 ]
Dodds, Paul E. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Cent House,14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2020年 / 12卷 / 03期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
BECCS; bioenergy; carbon dioxide removal; climate change mitigation; integrated assessment; scenario analysis; CAPTURE; INDUSTRY; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12666
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy is expected to have a prominent role in limiting global greenhouse emissions to meet the climate change target of the Paris Agreement. Many studies identify negative emissions from bioenergy generation with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) as its key contribution, but assume that no other CO2 removal technologies are available. We use a global integrated assessment model, TIAM-UCL, to investigate the role of bioenergy within the global energy system when direct air capture and afforestation are available as cost-competitive alternatives to BECCS. We find that the presence of other CO2 removal technologies does not reduce the pressure on biomass resources but changes the use of bioenergy for climate mitigation. While we confirm that when available BECCS offers cheaper decarbonization pathways, we also find that its use delays the phase-out of unabated fossil fuels in industry and transport. Furthermore, it displaces renewable electricity generation, potentially increasing the likelihood of missing the Paris Agreement target. We found that the most cost-effective solution is to invest in a basket of CO2 removal technologies. However, if these technologies rely on CCS, then urgent action is required to ramp up the necessary infrastructure. We conclude that a sustainable biomass supply is critical for decarbonizing the global energy system. Since only a few world regions carry the burden of producing the biomass resource and store CO2 in geological storage, adequate international collaboration, policies and standards will be needed to realize this resource while avoiding undesired land-use change.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 212
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China
    Chen, Qianqian
    Gu, Yu
    Tang, Zhiyong
    Wei, Wei
    Sun, Yuhan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 220 : 192 - 207
  • [42] Evaluation and mitigation of cement CO2 emissions: projection of emission scenarios toward 2030 in China and proposal of the roadmap to a low-carbon world by 2050
    Wei, Junxiao
    Cen, Kuang
    Geng, Yuanbo
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2019, 24 (02) : 301 - 328
  • [43] Carbon neutral energy systems: Optimal integration of energy systems with CO2 abatement pathways
    Lameh, Mohammad
    Linke, Patrick
    Al-Mohannadi, Dhabia M.
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2024, 70 (11)
  • [44] Microalgae Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): An emerging sustainable bioprocess for reduced CO2 emission and biofuel production
    Choi Y.Y.
    Patel A.K.
    Hong M.E.
    Chang W.S.
    Sim S.J.
    Bioresource Technology Reports, 2019, 7
  • [45] Scoping carbon dioxide removal options for Germany-What is their potential contribution to Net-Zero CO2?
    Borchers, Malgorzata
    Thraen, Daniela
    Chi, Yaxuan
    Dahmen, Nicolaus
    Dittmeyer, Roland
    Dolch, Tobias
    Dold, Christian
    Foerster, Johannes
    Herbst, Michael
    Hess, Dominik
    Kalhori, Aram
    Koop-Jakobsen, Ketil
    Li, Zhan
    Mengis, Nadine
    Reusch, Thorsten B. H.
    Rhoden, Imke
    Sachs, Torsten
    Schmidt-Hattenberger, Cornelia
    Stevenson, Angela
    Thoni, Terese
    Wu, Jiajun
    Yeates, Christopher
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2022, 4
  • [46] Cryogenic liquefaction and separation of CO2 using nitrogen removal unit cold energy
    Knapik, Ewa
    Kosowski, Piotr
    Stopa, Jerzy
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2018, 131 : 66 - 79
  • [47] Critical materials in global low-carbon energy scenarios: The case for neodymium, dysprosium, lithium, and cobalt
    Junne, Tobias
    Wulff, Niklas
    Breyer, Christian
    Naegler, Tobias
    ENERGY, 2020, 211
  • [48] Total site modeling and optimization for petrochemical low-carbon retrofits using multiple CO2 emission reduction methods
    Su, Shun B.
    He, Chang
    Shu, Yidan
    Chen, Qing L.
    Zhang, Bing J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 383
  • [49] Deep CO2 removal using high pressure membrane contactors with low liquid-to-gas ratio
    Chan, Zhe Phak
    Li, Lin
    Kang, Guodong
    Ab Manan, Norfaizah
    Cao, Yiming
    Wang, Tonghua
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2020, 153 : 528 - 536
  • [50] Evaluation of CO2 Purification Requirements and the Selection of Processes for Impurities Deep Removal from the CO2 Product Stream
    Abbas, Zeina
    Mezher, Toufic
    Abu-Zahra, Mohammad R. M.
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 2389 - 2396