Influence of Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control on Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications in Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus

被引:50
作者
Mattila, Taina K. [1 ]
de Boer, Anthonius [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Clin Pharmacol, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; METAANALYSIS; TRIAL; HEMOGLOBIN; MORTALITY; THERAPY; EVENTS; ACCORD;
D O I
10.2165/11585220-000000000-00000
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In type I and 2 diabetes mellitus patients, hyperglycaemia is independently related to the development of microvascular and macrovascular complications Glycaemic targets and the benefits of intensive versus conventional glucose control are under debate The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses comparing the effects of intensive versus conventional glucose control on microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 and 2 diabetes MEDLINE and Cochrane database searches were performed with a limit on randomized controlled trials or meta-analysis and keywords related to glucose control and diabetes In addition, related articles and reference lists of relevant articles and guidelines were reviewed Nine randomized controlled trials, three in type 1 and six in type 2 diabetes, and four meta-analyses in type 2 diabetes were reviewed These studies included more than 30 000 patients On the basis of these trials and meta-analyses, it can be concluded that intensive glucose control has a beneficial effect on microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy) in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients The risk reduction of developing a microvascular complication varied between 25% and 76% Particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes, there was a 10-15% decrease in nonfatal myocardial infarction with intensive glucose control, but no effect on stroke, cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality was observed There was a beneficial effect of intensive glucose control on cardiovascular disease in patients with type I diabetes in only one trial In all studies, intensive glucose control was associated with at least twice the risk for serious hypoglycaemia than the conventional-control group In conclusion, compared with conventional glucose control, intensive glucose control is associated with fewer microvascular complications in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, a decrease in coronary events, especially in type 2 diabetes, and more serious hypoglycaemia
引用
收藏
页码:2229 / 2245
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Cardiovascular events and correlates in the Veterans Affairs diabetes feasibility trial - Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on gylcemic control and complications in type II diabetes [J].
Abraira, C ;
Colwell, J ;
Nuttall, F ;
Sawin, CT ;
Henderson, W ;
Comstock, JP ;
Emanuele, NV ;
Levin, SR ;
Pacold, I ;
Lee, HS ;
Silbert, CK ;
Cxypoliski, R ;
Vasquez, M ;
Kernan, D ;
Niewoehner, C ;
Backes, M ;
Bradley, M ;
Bradley, M ;
Crow, R ;
Rubino, F ;
Bushnell, D ;
Pfeifer, M ;
Service, FJ ;
Howard, B ;
Chew, E ;
Hoogwerf, B ;
Seigel, D ;
Clark, CM ;
Olefsky, JM ;
Porte, D ;
Sussman, KE ;
Johnson, N ;
Christine, B ;
Tir, K ;
Sather, M ;
Day, P ;
Morgan, N ;
Deykin, D ;
Gold, J ;
Huang, P .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (02) :181-188
[2]   Intensive glucose therapy and clinical implications of recent data: a consensus statement from the Global Task Force on Glycaemic Control [J].
Akalin, S. ;
Berntorp, K. ;
Ceriello, A. ;
Das, A. K. ;
Kilpatrick, E. S. ;
Koblik, T. ;
Munichoodappa, C. S. ;
Pan, C. Y. ;
Rosenthall, W. ;
Shestakova, M. ;
Wolnik, B. ;
Woo, V. ;
Yang, W. Y. ;
Yilmaz, M. T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (10) :1421-1425
[3]   Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2009 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 :S13-S61
[4]  
[Anonymous], DIAB ACT NOW IN WHO
[5]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[6]  
[Anonymous], NEW ENGL J MED
[7]  
[Anonymous], A D A M MED ENCY
[8]  
[Anonymous], CIRCULATION
[9]  
Banarer S, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V360, P2031, DOI 10.1056/NEJMc090262
[10]  
Bender R, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P254