A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for EOL product recovery optimization: turbocharger case study

被引:60
作者
Jun, H.-B. [1 ]
Cusin, M. [1 ]
Kiritsis, D. [1 ]
Xirouchakis, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Lab Comp Aided Design & Prod, STI IPR LICP,Stn 9, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
EOL product recovery; EOL decision; recovery cost; recovery quality; MOEA;
D O I
10.1080/00207540701440071
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Recently, the importance of the end- of- life ( EOL) product recovery process has been rising since the return rate of products is increasing due to strict environmental regulations on products and economic reasons. In addition to this, the advent of emerging product identification technologies makes product lifecycle data visible at EOL phase. In this regard, the optimization of product recovery processes becomes highlighted as a challenging issue of EOL. At the inspection phase after disassembly, each part can have various EOL recovery options such as re- use, remanufacturing, and disposal. Depending on the selected EOL options of parts, the recovery value of an EOL product will be different. Hence, it is essential to develop a decision- making method that can select the best EOL options of parts for maximizing the recovery value of an EOL product. Although some previous works have focused on improving EOL operations, there has been a lack of research which dealt with EOL product recovery optimization in a quantitative manner. To cope with this limitation, in this study, we focus on a selection problem of EOL product recovery options for a turbocharger case, for maximizing its recovery value which includes both recovery cost and quality. To solve the problem efficiently, we develop a multi- objective evolutionary algorithm ( MOEA). To show the effectiveness of our algorithm, we carry out computational experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:4573 / 4594
页数:22
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Coello C. A. C., 1999, Knowledge and Information Systems, V1, P269
  • [2] CUSIN M, 2006, THESIS MECHANICAL EN
  • [3] Deb K., 2001, Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms
  • [4] A survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization
    Ehrgott M.
    Gandibleux X.
    [J]. OR-Spektrum, 2000, 22 (4) : 425 - 460
  • [5] Effectiveness of planning and control systems: an empirical study of US and Japanese firms
    Sheu, CW
    Wacker, JG
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (05) : 887 - 905
  • [6] Issues in end-of-life product recovery and reverse logistics
    Ferguson, N
    Browne, J
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2001, 12 (05) : 534 - 547
  • [7] FLEISCHMANN M, 2001, LECT NOTES EC MATH S
  • [8] GEN M, 1997, GENETIC ALGORITHMS E
  • [9] The resource recovery level decision for end-of-life products
    Goggin, K
    Browne, J
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2000, 11 (07) : 628 - 640
  • [10] Reducing waste: Repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle?
    King, Andrew M.
    Burgess, Stuart C.
    Ijomah, Winnie
    McMahon, Chris A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 14 (04) : 257 - 267