Interpretation of flow fields induced by water spray systems in reduced-scale tunnel fire experiments by means of CFD simulations

被引:16
作者
Sun, Jiayun [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Zheng [1 ,3 ]
Beji, Tarek [2 ]
Merci, Bart [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Ghent Univ UGent, Dept Flow Heat & Combust Mech, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Engn Res Ctr Urban Disasters Prevent & Fire Rescu, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
CFD simulations; FDS; Tunnel fire; Water system; ANALYTICAL-MODEL; SPRINKLER SPRAY; SMOKE; COMPARTMENT; LAYER; HEAT; MIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.004
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation results, obtained with FDS 6.0.1 (McGrattan et al., 2013), are presented of reduced-scale tunnel fire tests. In (Sun et al., 2016), an extensive data set has been discussed in terms of temperature measurements in a reduced-scale tunnel, involving longitudinal ventilation and a variety of water supply through nozzles, in the context of potential smoke blockage. In (Sun et al., 2016), 10 different scenarios have been discussed, for different numbers of nozzles and different nozzle configurations. Given the limitation of the experimental instrumentation, as a series of thermocouple trees, a full interpretation of the flow field was impossible. Nevertheless, a detailed characterization and interpretation of this turbulent flow field under different circumstances is essential in the discussion of potential smoke blockage. To that purpose, CFD can be a very useful tool. In this paper, as a first step, results are presented for 2 cases, without mechanical longitudinal ventilation, in order to illustrate the validity and potential of the CFD simulations, with and without the water system (4 nozzles) activated. The validity of the CFD results, using the default FDS settings for turbulence and combustion modeling, is illustrated first through comparison of the temperature profiles with the experimental data. A comprehensive sensitivity study on the computational mesh and model settings for the water sprays is included. Subsequently, the mean flow and temperature fields are analyzed, providing significant additional insight into the impact of the water system. The entrainment, induced by the water sprays, is illustrated. This causes downward motion of the smoke in the sprays. By bumping onto each other, the impinging flows onto the floor in their turn create an upward flow in between the water spray envelopes that impinges onto the ceiling in the absence of longitudinal ventilation. The global effect is smoke blockage by the water system.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 102
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, FIRE SAF SCI
[2]   Experimental and Numerical Study of the Interaction Between Water Mist and Fire in an Intermediate Test Tunnel [J].
Blanchard, E. ;
Fromy, P. ;
Carlotti, P. ;
Boulet, P. ;
Desanghere, S. ;
Vantelon, J. P. ;
Garo, J. P. .
FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 50 (03) :565-587
[3]   Numerical modeling for interaction of a water spray with smoke layer [J].
Chow, WK ;
Yao, B .
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PART A-APPLICATIONS, 2001, 39 (03) :267-283
[4]   The interaction of an isolated sprinkler spray and a two-layer compartment fire environment. Phenomena and model simulations [J].
Cooper, LY .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1995, 25 (02) :89-107
[5]   Smoke control in case of fire in a large car park: CFD simulations of full-scale configurations [J].
Deckers, X. ;
Haga, S. ;
Tilley, N. ;
Merci, B. .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2013, 57 :22-34
[6]  
Drysdale D, 2011, INTRO FIRE DYNAMICS
[7]   A numerical study of the interaction of water spray with a fire plume [J].
Hua, JS ;
Kumar, K ;
Khoo, BC ;
Xue, H .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2002, 37 (07) :631-657
[8]   An experimental and numerical study on fire suppression using a water mist in an enclosure [J].
Kim, SC ;
Ryou, HS .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 38 (11) :1309-1316
[9]   Study of Water Droplet Behavior in Hot Air Layer in Fire Extinguishment [J].
Li, Y. F. ;
Chow, W. K. .
FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 44 (04) :351-381
[10]  
McGrattan K., 2018, NIST Special Publication, V1019