Transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo might not be a good protocol

被引:22
作者
Li, Mingzhao [1 ]
Wang, Hui [1 ]
Ma, Chun [1 ]
Shi, Juanzi [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Womens & Childrens Hosp, ART Ctr, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Cleavage-stage; clinical pregnancy; blastocyst-stage; UNITED-STATES; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; CYCLES; IVF;
D O I
10.1080/09513590.2017.1302420
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore whether transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo was suitable for the patients in the first fresh transfer.Methods: This study included 202 single grades I cleavage-stage, 229 single grades III cleavage-stage, 743 single excellent blastocyst, 522 double grades I cleavage-stage, and 596 double grades III cleavage-stage embryo transfers. Main clinical outcomes: clinical pregnancy and twin-pregnancy rate.Results: Among single excellent blastocyst, single grades I and single grades III group, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in single excellent blastocyst group than single grades I and grades III group (67.16% versus 42.08% versus 23.97%; p<0.001). When transferred double grades I cleavage-stage embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate reached 68.20% which was no significant difference compared with the single excellent blastocyst group (67.16%). However, the twin-pregnancy rate was significantly higher in double grades I group than double grades III and single excellent blastocyst group (43.26% versus 26.70% versus 0.60%; p<0.001).Conclusions: Because of higher twin-pregnancy incidence rate, transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo might not be a good protocol. Extended culture to blastocyst-stage could be considered for the patient with only two grades I cleavage-stage embryos.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 559
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Blastocyst quality affects the success of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer
    Balaban, B
    Urman, B
    Sertac, A
    Alatas, C
    Aksoy, S
    Mercan, R
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (02) : 282 - 287
  • [2] BLAKE DA, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V7
  • [3] Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos
    Fragouli, E.
    Alfarawati, S.
    Spath, K.
    Wells, D.
    [J]. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 20 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [4] Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer
    Gardner, DK
    Lane, M
    Stevens, J
    Schlenker, T
    Schoolcraft, WB
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (06) : 1155 - 1158
  • [5] Göçmen A, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P6272
  • [6] Can repeated IVF-ICSI-cycles be avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos?
    Kaartinen, Noora
    Das, Pia
    Kananen, Kirsi
    Huhtala, Heini
    Tinkanen, Helena
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2015, 30 (03) : 241 - 247
  • [7] Li M, 2015, GYNECOL ENDOCRINOL, V6, P1
  • [8] Effects of triploidy incidence on clinical outcomes for IVF-ET cycles in different ovarian stimulation protocols
    Li, Mingzhao
    Xue, Xia
    Zhang, Silin
    Li, Wei
    Zhao, Xiaoli
    Ren, Wenjuan
    Shi, Juanzi
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (10) : 769 - 773
  • [9] LUKE B, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P101
  • [10] Pregnancy-related mortality among women with multifetal pregnancies
    MacKay, Andrea R.
    Berg, Cynthia J.
    King, Jeffrey C.
    Duran, Catherine
    Chang, Jeani
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (03) : 563 - 568