Representing the sociology of scientific knowledge and law

被引:8
作者
Edmond, G [1 ]
Mercer, D
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge St Johns Coll, Cambridge CB2 1TP, England
[2] Univ Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1177/1075547098019004003
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) has become widely cited in policy contexts including discussion of law, science, and society. The following article provides a textual examination of how some of the work of eminent SSK and law scholar Sheila Jasanoff has been received in U.S. legal scholarship. Focusing on debate sparked by the 1993 Supreme Court case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the authors argue that textual evidence suggests a resistance within U.S. legal scholarship to the incorporation of the more radical implications of SSK perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 327
页数:21
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD J LAW TECHNO
[2]  
[Anonymous], HDB SCI TECHNOLOGY S, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412990127
[3]  
[Anonymous], CARDOZO L REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], CARDOZO L REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], EXPERT EVIDENCE
[6]  
ATIYAH FS, 1987, OXFORD J LEGAL STUDI, V7, P279
[7]  
AYALA FJ, 1993, AM SCI, V81, P230
[8]   EXPERT EVIDENCE - INTERPRETING SCIENCE IN THE LAW - SMITH,R, WYNNE,B [J].
BARNES, B .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1990, 20 (04) :757-760
[9]  
BLACK B, 1988, FORDHAM LAW REV, V56, P595
[10]  
BLACK B, 1994, TEX LAW REV, V72, P715