Is it Necessary to Re-Fuse a Non-Union of a Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis?

被引:20
作者
Hope, Matthew [1 ]
Savva, Nicholas [1 ]
Whitehouse, Sarah [1 ]
Elliot, Robin [1 ]
Saxby, Terry S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brisbane Private Hosp, Brisbane Foot & Ankle Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
Metatarsophalangeal; MTP; MTPJ; Joint; Fusion; Revision; Debridement: Non-union; SALVAGE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3113/FAI.2010.0662
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The standard treatment for a non-union of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint fusion has been to revise the fusion. Revision fusion is technically more demanding, often involving bone grafting, more substantial fixation and prolonged period of immobilization postoperatively. We present data to suggest that removal of hardware and debridement alone is an alternative treatment option. Materials and Methods: A case note review identified patients with a symptomatic non-union after hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) fusion. It is our practice to offer these patients revision fusion or removal of hardware and debridement. For the seven patients that chose hardware removal and were left with a pseudarthrosis, a matched control group was selected from patients who had had successful fusions. Three outcome scores were used. Hallux valgus and dorsiflexion angles were recorded. Results: One hundred thirty-nine hallux MTPJ arthrodeses were carried out. Fourteen non-unions were identified. The rate of nonunion in males and following previous hallux MTPJ surgery was 19% and 24%, respectively. In females undergoing a primary MTPJ fusion, the rate was 2.4%. Twelve non-union patients were reviewed at 27 months (mean). Eleven patients had elected to undergo removal of hardware and debridement. Four patients with pseudarthrosis were unhappy with the results and proceeded to either revision fusion or MTPJ replacement. Seven non-union patients, who had removal of hardware alone, had outcome scores marginally worse compared to those with successful fusions. Conclusion: Removal of hardware alone is a reasonable option to offer as a relatively minor procedure following a failed arthrodesis of the first MTPJ. This must be accepted on the proviso that in this study four out of 11 (36%) patients proceeded to a revision first MTPJ fusion or first MTPJ replacement. We also found that the rate of non-union in primary first MTPJ fusion was significantly higher in males and those patients who had undergone previous surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 669
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Baumhauer Judith F, 2003, Foot Ankle Clin, V8, P37, DOI 10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00129-8
[2]  
Bennett GL, 2005, FOOT ANKLE INT, V26, P593
[3]   Salvage first MTP arthrodesis utilizing ICBG: Clinical evaluation and outcome [J].
Brodsky, JW ;
Ptaszek, AJ ;
Morris, SG .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 21 (04) :290-296
[4]   THE FOOT FUNCTION INDEX - A MEASURE OF FOOT PAIN AND DISABILITY [J].
BUDIMANMAK, E ;
CONRAD, KJ ;
ROACH, KE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (06) :561-570
[5]   ARTHRODESIS OF THE 1ST METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT AS SALVAGE FOR THE FAILED KELLER PROCEDURE [J].
COUGHLIN, MJ ;
MANN, RA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (01) :68-75
[6]   Technique tip: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint - Prevention of excessive dorsiflexion [J].
DeOrio, James K. .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 28 (06) :746-747
[7]  
FITZGERALD J A W, 1969, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, V51-B, P488
[8]   First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis as a treatment for failed hallux valgus surgery [J].
Grimes, Jerry Speight ;
Coughlin, Michael J. .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 27 (11) :887-893
[9]   Cost comparison of crossed screws versus dorsal plate construct for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis [J].
Hyer, Christopher F. ;
Glover, Jason P. ;
Berlet, Gregory C. ;
Lee, Thomas H. .
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2008, 47 (01) :13-18
[10]  
Jarde Olivier, 2005, Acta Orthop Belg, V71, P76