Understanding demand and supply paradoxes and their role in business-to-business firms

被引:30
作者
Golgeci, Ismail [1 ]
Karakas, Fahri [2 ]
Tatoglu, Ekrem [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Sch Business & Social Sci, Birk Ctr Pk 15,Bldg 8001, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
[2] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Ibn Haldun Univ, Sch Business, TR-34494 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Demand-supply interface; Paradox; Demand and supply activities; Qualitative research; CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; DIFFERENTIATION; COORDINATION; COOPETITION; INTEGRATION; LOGISTICS; WORKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.08.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore paradoxes firms face when managing demand and supply activities and managers' experience of coping with and transcending these paradoxes. Following an exploratory research approach and based on the analysis of interviews with executive managers, documents from, and observations of 19 business-to-business (B2B) firms, we develop empirically grounded propositions. We first find and explain three major demand and supply paradoxes, namely collaboration-competition, concord-conflict, and integration-differentiation. We then expand on the handling mechanisms B2B firms employ to respond to these paradoxes. We find that B2B firms that understand, balance, and transcend demand and supply paradoxes achieve greater synergy between demand and supply activities and leverage both demand and supply approaches as overarching guiding principles for their strategy. Our study informs B2B marketing and marketing strategy by exploring the nature and role of paradoxes that shape the relationships between demand and supply activities. In doing so, it also offers an empirical account of the discrepancy between the theory and practice of demand and supply integration.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   Understanding the sales-marketing interface dysfunction experience in business-to-business firms: A matter of perspective [J].
Malshe, Avinash ;
Johnson, Jeff S. ;
Viio, Paul .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 63 :145-157
[32]  
Marvasti A., 2008, Doing qualitative research
[33]   Hitting the Target ... but Missing the Point: Resolving the Paradox of Strategic Transition [J].
Melnyk, Steven A. ;
Hanson, John D. ;
Calantone, Roger J. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (04) :555-574
[34]   SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO LOGISTICS, MARKETING, PRODUCTION, AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT [J].
Mentzer, John T. ;
Stank, Theodore P. ;
Esper, Terry L. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2008, 29 (01) :31-+
[35]   Cross-functional knowledge sharing, coordination and firm performance: The role of cross-functional competition [J].
Nguyen Phong Nguyen ;
Liem Viet Ngo ;
Bucic, Tania ;
Nguyen Dong Phong .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 :123-134
[36]  
Oliver A.L., 2004, SCAND J MANAG, V20, P151, DOI [10.1016/j.scaman.2004.06, DOI 10.1016/J.SCAMAN.2004.06, DOI 10.1016/J.SCAMAN.2004.06.002]
[37]   Managing the Tensions at the [Intersection of the Triple Bottom Line: A Paradox Theory Approach to Sustainabillity Management [J].
Ozanne, Lucie K. ;
Phipps, Marcus ;
Weaver, Todd ;
Carrington, Michal ;
Luchs, Michael ;
Catlin, Jesse ;
Gupta, Shipra ;
Santos, Nicholas ;
Scott, Kristin ;
Williams, Jerome .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 2016, 35 (02) :249-261
[38]   Creating Economic and Environmental Value through Industrial Symbiosis [J].
Paquin, Raymond L. ;
Busch, Timo ;
Tilleman, Suzanne G. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2015, 48 (02) :95-107
[39]   'Good' case research in industrial marketing: Insights from research practice [J].
Piekkari, Rebecca ;
Plakoyiannaki, Emmanuella ;
Welch, Catherine .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (01) :109-117
[40]   Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach [J].
Putnam, Linda L. ;
Fairhurst, Gail T. ;
Banghart, Scott .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2016, 10 (01) :65-171