Recent Developments in Family Psychoeducation as an Evidence-Based Practice

被引:184
作者
Lucksted, Alicia [1 ]
McFarlane, William [2 ]
Downing, Donna
Dixon, Lisa [1 ]
Adams, Curtis
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Div Res Serv, Dept Psychiat, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Medford, MA 02155 USA
关键词
ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT; MENTAL-HEALTH; 1ST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS; MULTIFAMILY PSYCHOEDUCATION; INTEGRATED TREATMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; EXPRESSED EMOTION; NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS; VIETNAM VETERANS; CHINESE FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00256.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Among potential resources for people with serious mental illnesses (SMI) and their families, professionally delivered family psychoeducation (FPE) is designed to engage, inform, and educate family members, so that they can assist the person with SMI in managing their illness. In this article, we review research regarding FPE outcomes and implementation since 2001, updating the previous review in this journal (McFarlane, Dixon, Lukens, & Lucksted, 2003; 29, 223). Research on a range of FPE variations continues to return mostly positive effects for adults with schizophrenia and increasingly, bipolar disorder. More recent studies include functional outcomes as well as the more common relapse and hospitalization. FPE research involving adults with other diagnoses is increasing, as is FPE research outside the United States In both cases, uneven methodologies and multiple FPE variations make drawing conclusions difficult, although the core utility of access to information, skill building, problem solving, and social support often shines though. Since the previous review, several FPE programs for parents of children or youth with mood disorders have also been developed, with limited research showing more positive than null results. Similarly, we review the developing inquiry into early intervention and FPE, short-form FPE, and cost studies involving FPE. The second half of the article updates the paradox of FPEs evidence base versus its persistently low use, via recent implementation efforts. Multiple challenges and facilitating factors across healthcare systems and financing, individual programs and providers, family members, and consumers shape this issue, and we conclude with discussion of the need for empirical evaluation of implementation strategies and models.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 121
页数:21
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   Three-year outcome of family work in an early psychosis program [J].
Addington, J ;
McCleery, A ;
Addington, D .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2005, 79 (01) :107-116
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHIAT REHABILITAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW STAT FAM PSYCH I
[4]  
[Anonymous], CAR PEOPL SEV MENT D
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HHS PUB
[6]  
[Anonymous], FAM PARTN CAR DOC DE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J AM ACAD CHILD ADOL, V46, P107
[8]   Empirically supported couple and family interventions for marital distress and adult mental health problems [J].
Baucom, DH ;
Shoham, V ;
Mueser, KT ;
Daiuto, AD ;
Stickle, TR .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 66 (01) :53-88
[9]   Family intervention in schizophrenia -: Impact on family burden and attitude [J].
Berglund, N ;
Vahlne, JO ;
Edman, Å .
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (03) :116-121
[10]   Strategies for Improving Fidelity in the National Evidence-Based Practices Project [J].
Bond, Gary R. ;
Drake, Robert E. ;
McHugo, Gregory J. ;
Rapp, Charles A. ;
Whitley, Rob .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2009, 19 (05) :569-581