Doing It Your Way: How Individual Movement Styles Affect Action Prediction

被引:23
|
作者
Koul, Atesh [1 ]
Cavallo, Andrea [2 ]
Ansuini, Caterina [1 ]
Becchio, Cristina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Ist Italiano Tecnol, CMON Unit, Ctr Human Technol, I-16152 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Psychol, I-10123 Turin, Italy
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 10期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
STIMULUS PROBABILITY; DIFFUSION MODEL; MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; INTENTIONS; PERCEPTION; MIRROR; GOAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0165297
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Individuals show significant variations in performing a motor act. Previous studies in the action observation literature have largely ignored this ubiquitous, if often unwanted, characteristic of motor performance, assuming movement patterns to be highly similar across repetitions and individuals. In the present study, we examined the possibility that individual variations in motor style directly influence the ability to understand and predict others' actions. To this end, we first recorded grasping movements performed with different intents and used a two-step cluster analysis to identify quantitatively 'clusters' of movements performed with similar movement styles (Experiment 1). Next, using videos of the same movements, we proceeded to examine the influence of these styles on the ability to judge intention from action observation (Experiments 2 and 3). We found that motor styles directly influenced observers' ability to 'read' others' intention, with some styles always being less 'readable' than others. These results provide experimental support for the significance of motor variability for action prediction, suggesting that the ability to predict what another person is likely to do next directly depends on her individual movement style.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions
    Stadler, Waltraud
    Springer, Anne
    Parkinson, Jim
    Prinz, Wolfgang
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2012, 76 (04): : 395 - 406