Oncologic Imaging and Radiomics: A Walkthrough Review of Methodological Challenges

被引:40
作者
Stanzione, Arnaldo [1 ]
Cuocolo, Renato [2 ]
Ugga, Lorenzo [1 ]
Verde, Francesco [1 ]
Romeo, Valeria [1 ]
Brunetti, Arturo [1 ]
Maurea, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Salerno, Dept Med Surg & Dent, I-84081 Baronissi, Italy
关键词
radiomics; reproducibility; oncologic imaging; evidence-based medicine; research quality; REPRODUCIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; GENERALIZABILITY; STABILITY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14194871
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Radiomics could increase the value of medical images for oncologic patients, allowing for the identification of novel imaging biomarkers and building prediction models. Unfortunately, despite the many promises and encouraging findings, the translation of radiomics into clinical practice appears as a distant goal. Indeed, challenges such as generalizability and reproducibility are slowing down the process and must be faced with a rigorous and robust radiomic methodology. In this review, we turn the spotlight to the methodological complexity of radiomics, providing an outline of dos and don'ts aimed at facilitating state-of-the-art research. Imaging plays a crucial role in the management of oncologic patients, from the initial diagnosis to staging and treatment response monitoring. Recently, it has been suggested that its importance could be further increased by accessing a new layer of previously hidden quantitative data at the pixel level. Using a multi-step process, radiomics extracts potential biomarkers from medical images that could power decision support tools. Despite the growing interest and rising number of research articles being published, radiomics is still far from fulfilling its promise of guiding oncologic imaging toward personalized medicine. This is, at least partly, due to the heterogeneous methodological quality in radiomic research, caused by the complexity of the analysis pipelines. In this review, we aim to disentangle this complexity with a stepwise approach. Specifically, we focus on challenges to face during image preprocessing and segmentation, how to handle imbalanced classes and avoid information leaks, as well as strategies for the proper validation of findings.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms [J].
Altazi, Baderaldeen A. ;
Zhang, Geoffrey G. ;
Fernandez, Daniel C. ;
Montejo, Michael E. ;
Hunt, Dylan ;
Werner, Joan ;
Biagioli, Matthew C. ;
Moros, Eduardo G. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (06) :32-48
[2]  
[Anonymous], STAT THINKING CLASSI
[3]   Robustness and Reproducibility of Radiomics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging A Phantom Study [J].
Baessler, Bettina ;
Weiss, Kilian ;
dos Santos, Daniel Pinto .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2019, 54 (04) :221-228
[4]   Radiogenomics: bridging imaging and genomics [J].
Bodalal, Zuhir ;
Trebeschi, Stefano ;
Nguyen-Kim, Thi Dan Linh ;
Schats, Winnie ;
Beets-Tan, Regina .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (06) :1960-1984
[5]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[6]   Deep Learning: An Update for Radiologists [J].
Cheng, Phillip M. ;
Montagnon, Emmanuel ;
Yamashita, Rikiya ;
Pan, Ian ;
Cadrin-Chenevert, Alexandre ;
Romero, Francisco Perdigon ;
Chartrand, Gabriel ;
Kadoury, Samuel ;
Tang, An .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2021, 41 (05) :1427-1445
[7]   Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
Dhiman, Paula ;
Andaur Navarro, Constanza L. ;
Ma, Ji ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
Logullo, Patricia ;
Beam, Andrew L. ;
Peng, Lily ;
Van Calster, Ben ;
van Smeden, Maarten ;
Riley, Richard D. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07)
[8]   MRI index lesion radiomics and machine learning for detection of extraprostatic extension of disease: a multicenter study [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo ;
Faletti, Riccardo ;
Gatti, Marco ;
Calleris, Giorgio ;
Fornari, Alberto ;
Gentile, Francesco ;
Motta, Aurelio ;
Dell'Aversana, Serena ;
Creta, Massimiliano ;
Longo, Nicola ;
Gontero, Paolo ;
Cirillo, Stefano ;
Fonio, Paolo ;
Imbriaco, Massimo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (10) :7575-7583
[9]   Quality control and whole-gland, zonal and lesion annotations for the PROSTATEx challenge public dataset [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo ;
Castaldo, Anna ;
De Lucia, Davide Raffaele ;
Imbriaco, Massimo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 138
[10]   Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: A systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo ;
Ponsiglione, Andrea ;
Verde, Francesco ;
Ventimiglia, Antonio ;
Romeo, Valeria ;
Petretta, Mario ;
Imbriaco, Massimo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 120