The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm

被引:1
作者
Park, Bo Youn [1 ]
Kim, Sujin [1 ]
Cho, Yang Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Psychol, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
关键词
Attention: Selective; Dual task procedures (PRP); Dual-task performance; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT DISTRACTORS; VISUAL SELECTIVE ATTENTION; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; STROOP DILUTION; SEARCH; AUTOMATICITY; PERFORMANCE; INHIBITION; BOTTLENECK;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-017-1442-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The congruency effect of a task-irrelevant distractor has been found to be modulated by task-relevant set size and display set size. The present study used a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm to examine the cognitive loci of the display set size effect (dilution effect) and the task-relevant set size effect (perceptual load effect) on distractor interference. A tone discrimination task (Task 1), in which a response was made to the pitch of the target tone, was followed by a letter discrimination task (Task 2) in which different types of visual target display were used. In Experiment 1, in which display set size was manipulated to examine the nature of the display set size effect on distractor interference in Task 2, the modulation of the congruency effect by display set size was observed at both short and long stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs), indicating that the display set size effect occurred after the target was selected for processing in the focused attention stage. In Experiment 2, in which task-relevant set size was manipulated to examine the nature of the task-relevant set size effect on distractor interference in Task 2, the effects of task-relevant set size increased with SOA, suggesting that the target selection efficiency in the preattentive stage was impaired with increasing task-relevant set size. These results suggest that display set size and task-relevant set size modulate distractor processing in different ways.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Look here but ignore what you see: Effects of distractors at fixation [J].
Beck, DM ;
Lavie, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2005, 31 (03) :592-607
[2]   Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects [J].
Benoni, Hanna ;
Zivony, Alon ;
Tsal, Yehoshua .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) :785-792
[3]   Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load [J].
Benoni, Hanna ;
Tsal, Yehoshua .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[4]   Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: Perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty [J].
Benoni, Hanna ;
Tsal, Yehoshua .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (04) :631-638
[5]   Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention [J].
Benoni, Hanna ;
Tsal, Yehoshua .
VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (13) :1292-1298
[6]   Visual Salience Can Co-Exist With Dilution During Visual Selection [J].
Biggs, Adam T. ;
Gibson, Bradley S. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (01) :7-14
[7]  
Broadbent D.E., 1958, Perception and Communication, P244, DOI DOI 10.1037/10037-010
[8]   Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: Is word recognition "automatic"? [J].
Brown, TL ;
Gore, CL ;
Carr, TH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2002, 131 (02) :220-240
[9]   AUTOMATICITY AND WORD PERCEPTION - EVIDENCE FROM STROOP AND STROOP DILUTION EFFECTS [J].
BROWN, TL ;
ROOSGILBERT, L ;
CARR, TH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (06) :1395-1411
[10]   Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference [J].
Chen, Z .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (06) :888-900