Prognostic Values of the Timing of Antibiotic Administration and the Sepsis Bundle Component in Elderly Patients With Septic Shock: A Retrospective Study

被引:5
|
作者
Liang, Chih-Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Yong-Ye [1 ]
Hung, Chi-Chieh [1 ]
Wang, Tsung-Han [1 ]
Hsu, Yin-Chou [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] I Shou Univ, Dept Informat Engn, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] I Shou Univ, Sch Chinese Med Post Baccalaureate, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] I Shou Univ, Sch Med Int Student, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
来源
SHOCK | 2022年 / 57卷 / 02期
关键词
Antibacterial agents; care bundle; elderly; prognosis; septic shock; time-to-treatment; COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; MULTICENTER; IMPACT; STEWARDSHIP; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000001854
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Elderly patients are more susceptible to sepsis and septic shock. Early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is a key element of the sepsis management of bundle. Our study aimed to investigate the association between the timing of antibiotics administration and the risk of adverse outcomes in elderly patients with septic shock, and to examine the prognostic value of other bundle elements. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective, case-control study including elderly patients (aged >= 65 years) diagnosed with septic shock in the emergency department between October 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Eligible patients were divided into early (within 1 h) and late (beyond 1 h) groups according to the time interval between septic shock recognition and initial antibiotic administration. The characteristics, sepsis-related severity scores, management strategy, and outcomes were recorded. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the independent prognostic factors. Results: A total of 331 patients were included in the study. The overall 90-day mortality rate was 43.8% (145/331). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, sepsis-related severity scores, and management strategy between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the early and late groups in the rate of intensive care unit transfer (46.4% vs. 46.6%, P = 0.96), endotracheal intubation (28.3% vs. 27.5%, P = 0.87), renal replacement therapy (21.7% vs. 21.8%, P = 1.00), or 90-day mortality (44.2% vs. 43.5%, P = 0.90). Serum lactate level (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15, P < 0.01) and source control (HR = 0.56, P = 0.03) were identified as independent factors associated with 90-day mortality. Conclusion: The timing of antibiotic administration was not associated with adverse outcomes in elderly patients with septic shock. Serum lactate level and source control implementation were independent prognostic factors in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decreasing Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients by Implementing a Sepsis Bundle in a Hospital Setting
    Pereira Lima Shiramizo, Sandra Christina
    Marra, Alexandre R.
    Durao, Marcelino S.
    Paes, Angela T.
    Edmond, Michael B.
    Pavao dos Santos, Oscar Fernando
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [42] Compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to Scottish ICUs
    JA Davidson
    K Dunne
    Critical Care, 16 (Suppl 1):
  • [43] Interhospital Transfer Delays Appropriate Treatment for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Faine, Brett A.
    Noack, Joseph M.
    Wong, Terrance
    Messerly, Jeffrey T.
    Ahmed, Azeemuddin
    Fuller, Brian M.
    Mohr, Nicholas M.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (12) : 2589 - 2596
  • [44] Impact of the sepsis bundle strategy on the outcomes of the patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock
    Z Wang
    Critical Care, 14 (Suppl 1):
  • [45] EFFECTIVE ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT PRESCRIBED BY EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS IN PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT WITH SEVERE SEPSIS OR SEPTIC SHOCK: WHERE IS THE GAP?
    Capp, Roberta
    Chang, Yuchiao
    Brown, David F. M.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (06) : 573 - 580
  • [46] Prognostic evaluation of the norepinephrine equivalent score and the vasoactive-inotropic score in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Wenzhe
    Wang, Yi
    Abuduaini, Buzukela
    Li, Xiang
    Pan, Pengfei
    Cui, Jian
    Yu, Xiangyou
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [47] Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of patients with septic shock: a retrospective cohort study
    Xu, Jun
    Chen, Jian
    Cai, Hongliu
    Zheng, Xia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [48] Pentraxin-3, procalcitonin and lactate as prognostic markers in patients with sepsis and septic shock
    Hu, Chenggong
    Zhou, Yongfang
    Liu, Chang
    Kang, Yan
    ONCOTARGET, 2018, 9 (04) : 5125 - 5136
  • [49] Prognostic values of B-type natriuretic peptide in severe sepsis and septic shock
    McLean, Anthony S.
    Huang, Stephen J.
    Hyams, Stephanie
    Poh, Genie
    Nalos, Marek
    Pandit, Rahul
    Balik, Martin
    Tang, Ben
    Seppelt, Ian
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (04) : 1019 - 1026
  • [50] Is Carboxyhaemoglobin an Effective Bedside Prognostic Tool for Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients?
    Grigorescu, Bianca-Liana
    Coman, Oana
    Vasiesiu, Anca Meda
    Bacarea, Anca
    Petrisor, Marius
    Saplacan, Irina
    Fodor, Raluca Stefania
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 9 (04) : 239 - 251