Performance comparison of two anammox reactors: SBR and UBF

被引:81
作者
Jin, Ren-Cun [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Ping [1 ]
Hu, An-Hui [1 ]
Mahmood, Qaisar [1 ]
Hu, Bao-Lan [1 ]
Jilani, Ghulam [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Hangzhou 310029, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Hangzhou 310016, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Arid Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
关键词
anammox; sequencing batch reactor; upflow biofilter; biological nitrogen removal; wastewater treatment;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2007.06.038
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The performance of two selected high rate anammox reactors, i.e. sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and an upflow biofilter (UBF) were compared operating them simultaneously at 30 degrees C. The sludge from anaerobic digester of a municipal wastewater treatment plant was used for inoculation and synthetic wastewater was fed to both reactors during the experiment. During start-up, the nitrogen loading rate (NLR) was increased gradually from an initial 140 to 560 mg/l day. The comparison of the performance revealed that the NLRs of SBR (2.7 g/l day) and UBF (2.5 g/l day) were far higher than those of the traditional nitrification/denitrification process. The biomass production of SBR outcompeted that of UBF. SBR took a longer time for start-up, i.e. about 57 days compared with 31 days of UBF Moreover, SBR tolerated smaller pulse of substrate concentration and hydraulic load, showing a weaker stability compared with UBF (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 230
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*APHA AWWA WEF, 1998, STAND METH WAT WAST
[2]   N2 production by the anammox reaction in the anoxic water column of Golfo Dulce, Costa Rica [J].
Dalsgaard, T ;
Canfield, DE ;
Petersen, J ;
Thamdrup, B ;
Acuña-González, J .
NATURE, 2003, 422 (6932) :606-608
[3]   Anammox process for nitrogen removal from anaerobically digested fish canning effluents [J].
Dapena-Mora, A. ;
Campos, J. L. ;
Mosquera-Corral, A. ;
Mendez, R. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (12) :265-274
[4]   Improvement of the settling properties of Anammox sludge in an SBR [J].
Dapena-Mora, A ;
Arrojo, B ;
Campos, JL ;
Mosquera-Corral, A ;
Méndez, R .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 79 (12) :1417-1420
[5]   Enrichment and characterization of an anammox bacterium from a rotating biological contactor treating ammonium-rich leachate [J].
Egli, K ;
Fanger, U ;
Alvarez, PJJ ;
Siegrist, H ;
van der Meer, JR ;
Zehnder, AJB .
ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 175 (03) :198-207
[6]   Mass cultivation of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing sludge using a novel nonwoven biomass carrier [J].
Furukawa, K ;
Rouse, JD ;
Yoshida, N ;
Hatanaka, H .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2003, 36 (10) :1163-1169
[7]   Biological treatment of ammonium-rich wastewater by partial nitritation and subsequent anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in a pilot plant [J].
Fux, C ;
Boehler, M ;
Huber, P ;
Brunner, I ;
Siegrist, H .
JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 99 (03) :295-306
[8]   Single stage biological nitrogen removal by nitritation and anaerobic ammonium oxidation in biofilm systems [J].
Helmer, C ;
Tromm, C ;
Hippen, A ;
Rosenwinkel, KH ;
Seyfried, CF ;
Kunst, S .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 43 (01) :311-320
[9]   Osmotic stress on nitrification in an airlift bioreactor [J].
Jin, Ren-Cun ;
Zheng, Ping ;
Mahmood, Qaisar ;
Hu, Bao-Lan .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 146 (1-2) :148-154
[10]   Anaerobic ammonium oxidation by anammox bacteria in the Black Sea [J].
Kuypers, MMM ;
Sliekers, AO ;
Lavik, G ;
Schmid, M ;
Jorgensen, BB ;
Kuenen, JG ;
Damsté, JSS ;
Strous, M ;
Jetten, MSM .
NATURE, 2003, 422 (6932) :608-611