Faculty Career Tracks at US Medical Schools

被引:32
作者
Coleman, Michelle M. [2 ]
Richard, George V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Careers Med Program, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
关键词
TENURE POLICIES; APPOINTMENT; FUTURE; PROMOTION;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182222699
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose To describe faculty career tracks at U.S. MD-granting schools and explore which institutional characteristics are associated with the career tracks. Method Between 2008 and 2009, the authors sought the faculty policies of 129 accredited MD-granting U.S. medical schools, through online searching and requests to faculty affairs representatives. An inventory of tenured and nontenured career tracks was conducted in the areas of teaching, research, and clinical care. Career track data were analyzed according to institutional characteristics. Results Complete data were collected from 98 schools (76%). On average, schools offered 3.6 career tracks to all faculty (range 1-8). Of the 353 career tracks identified, 210 were nontenured. Overall, schools offered more research tracks than education or clinical tracks. Of the 79 schools with clearly defined career tracks, 78 offered at least one clinical track; 34 offered at least one education track. Approximately 25% of the clinical tracks were tenured; 41% of the education tracks were tenured. Of the 98 schools, 61% used modified titles for faculty pursuing nontenure tracks. Schools that offered more career tracks were more likely to use modified titles for their nontenured clinical and research faculty. Schools with a smaller faculty size offered a greater number of clinical tracks, whereas community-based schools offered fewer clinical tracks. Research-intensive schools provided significantly more tenured clinical tracks. Conclusions There is great variation in faculty tracks and policies across institutions. This research may help institutions craft their own faculty policies and help students, residents, and faculty in making career decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 937
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*ASS AM MED COLL, 2006, AAMC STAT PHYS WORKF
[2]  
*ASS AM MED COLL, 2010 MED SCH GRAD QU
[3]   A time to be promotedThe prospective study of promotion in academia (prospective study of promotion in academia) [J].
Brent W. Beasley ;
Stephen D. Simon ;
Scott M. Wright .
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006, 21 (2) :123-129
[4]   The continued evolution of faculty appointment and tenure policies at US medical schools [J].
Bunton, Sarah A. ;
Mallon, William T. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (03) :281-289
[5]   Tenure and the Future of the University [J].
Clawson, Dan .
SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5931) :1147-1148
[6]   Clinical faculty tracks and academic success at the University of California Medical Schools [J].
Howell, LP ;
Bertakis, KD .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (03) :250-257
[7]   Issues and Challenges of Non-Tenure-Track Research Faculty: The UC Davis School of Medicine Experience [J].
Howell, Lydia Pleotis ;
Chen, Chao-Yin ;
Joad, Jesse P. ;
Green, Ralph ;
Callahan, Edward J. ;
Bonham, Ann C. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (06) :1041-1047
[8]   Faculty appointment and tenure policies in medical schools: A 1997 status report [J].
Jones, RF ;
Gold, JS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (02) :212-219
[9]   The present and future of appointment, tenure, and compensation policies for medical school clinical faculty [J].
Jones, RF ;
Gold, JS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2001, 76 (10) :993-1004
[10]   FACULTY TRACKS AND ACADEMIC-SUCCESS [J].
KELLEY, WN ;
STROSS, JK .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 116 (08) :654-659