Hypothesis testing in Bayesian network meta-analysis

被引:15
作者
Uhlmann, Lorenz [1 ]
Jensen, Katrin [1 ]
Kieser, Meinhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Neuenheimer Feld 130-3, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Network meta-analysis; Hypothesis testing; Treatment comparison; Superiority; Non-inferiority; INCONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-018-0574-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundNetwork meta-analysis is an extension of the classical pairwise meta-analysis and allows to compare multiple interventions based on both head-to-head comparisons within trials and indirect comparisons across trials. Bayesian or frequentist models are applied to obtain effect estimates with credible or confidence intervals. Furthermore, p-values or similar measures may be helpful for the comparison of the included arms but related methods are not yet addressed in the literature. In this article, we discuss how hypothesis testing can be done in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.MethodsAn index is presented and discussed in a Bayesian modeling framework. Simulation studies were performed to evaluate the characteristics of this index. The approach is illustrated by a real data example.ResultsThe simulation studies revealed that the type I error rate is controlled. The approach can be applied in a superiority as well as in a non-inferiority setting.ConclusionsTest decisions can be based on the proposed index. The index may be a valuable complement to the commonly reported results of network meta-analyses. The method is easy to apply and of no (noticeable) additional computational cost.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AHCPR PUBL, V96-0692
[3]   Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events [J].
Bradburn, Michael J. ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Localio, A. Russell .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) :53-77
[4]  
Datta GS, 2005, 252 U COLL LOND DEP
[5]   Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis [J].
Dias, S. ;
Welton, N. J. ;
Caldwell, D. M. ;
Ades, A. E. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (7-8) :932-944
[6]   Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2: A Generalized Linear Modeling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Dias, Sofia ;
Sutton, Alex J. ;
Ades, A. E. ;
Welton, Nicky J. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (05) :607-617
[7]   GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology [J].
Efthimiou, Orestis ;
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
van Valkenhoef, Gert ;
Trelle, Sven ;
Panayidou, Klea ;
Moons, Karel G. M. ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
Shang, Aijing ;
Salanti, Georgia .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2016, 7 (03) :236-263
[8]   Meta-analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases [J].
Friede, Tim ;
Roever, Christian ;
Wandel, Simon ;
Neuenschwander, Beat .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2017, 8 (01) :79-91
[9]  
Gelman A., 2005, Statistical Science, V20, P380, DOI DOI 10.1214/088342305000000368
[10]   Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies [J].
Hasselblad, V .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (01) :37-43