Factors associated with use of slip-resistant shoes in US limited-service restaurant workers

被引:7
作者
Verma, Santosh K. [1 ,2 ]
Courtney, Theodore K. [1 ,3 ]
Corns, Helen L. [1 ]
Huang, Yueng-Hsiang [4 ]
Lombardi, David A. [1 ,3 ]
Chang, Wen-Ruey [5 ]
Brennan, Melanye J. [1 ]
Perry, Melissa J. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Ctr Injury Epidemiol, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Sch Med, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Environm & Occupat Med & Epidemiol Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Ctr Behav Sci, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[5] Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Ctr Phys Ergon, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[6] George Washington Univ, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Washington, DC USA
关键词
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; LONGITUDINAL DATA-ANALYSIS; UNDERFOOT ACCIDENTS; PREVENT BLOOD; BACK-PAIN; FALLS; FRICTION; SLIPPERINESS; PREDICTORS; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040094
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives Slips and falls are a leading cause of injury at work. Several studies have indicated that slip-resistant shoes can reduce the risk of occupational slips and falls. Few studies, however, have examined the determinants of slip-resistant shoe use. This study examined the individual and workplace factors associated with slip-resistant shoe use. Methods 475 workers from 36 limited-service restaurants in the USA participated in a study of workplace slipping. Demographic and job characteristic information about each participant was collected. Restaurant managers provided information on whether slip-resistant shoes were provided and paid for by the employer and whether any guidance was given regarding slip-resistant shoe use when they were not provided. Kitchen floor coefficient of friction was measured. Slip-resistant status of the shoes was determined by noting the presence of a 'slip-resistant' marking on the sole. Poisson regression with robust SE was used to calculate prevalence ratios. Results 320 participants wore slip-resistant shoes (67%). In the multivariate analysis, the prevalence of slip-resistant shoe use was lowest in 15-19-year age group. Women were more likely to wear slip-resistant shoes (prevalence ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.31). The prevalence of slip-resistant shoe use was lower when no guidance regarding slip-resistant shoes was given as compared to when they were provided by the employer (prevalence ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.79). Education level, job tenure and the mean coefficient of friction had no significant effects on the use of slip-resistant shoes. Conclusion Provision of slip-resistant shoes was the strongest predictor of their use. Given their effectiveness and low cost, employers should consider providing slip-resistant shoes at work.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 181
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] The use and failure rates of protective equipment to prevent blood and bodily fluid contamination in the obstetric health care worker
    Ahmad, FK
    Sherman, SJ
    Hagglund, KH
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (01) : 131 - 136
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, INCIDENCE EC BURDEN, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195179484.001.0001
  • [4] Evaluation of a comprehensive slip, trip and fall prevention programme for hospital employees
    Bell, Jennifer L.
    Collins, James W.
    Wolf, Laurie
    Gronqvist, Raoul
    Chiou, Sharon
    Chang, Wen-Ruey
    Sorock, Gary S.
    Courtney, Theodore K.
    Lombardi, David A.
    Evanoff, Bradley
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2008, 51 (12) : 1906 - 1925
  • [5] Friction variation in common working areas of fast-food restaurants in the USA
    Chang, Wen-Ruey
    Li, Kai Way
    Filiaggi, Alfred
    Huang, Yueng-Hsiang
    Courtney, Theodore K.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2008, 51 (12) : 1998 - 2012
  • [6] The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1:: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions
    Chang, WR
    Grönqvist, R
    Leclercq, S
    Myung, R
    Makkonen, L
    Strandberg, L
    Brungraber, RJ
    Mattke, U
    Thorpe, SC
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2001, 44 (13) : 1217 - 1232
  • [7] The effects of slip criterion and time on friction measurements
    Chang, WR
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2002, 40 (7-8) : 593 - 611
  • [8] Factors influencing restaurant worker perception of floor slipperiness
    Courtney, Theodore K.
    Huang, Yueng-Hsiang
    Verma, Santosh K.
    Chang, Wen-Ruey
    Li, Kai Way
    Filiaggi, Alfred J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2006, 3 (11) : 593 - U1
  • [9] Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries - can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated?
    Courtney, TK
    Sorock, GS
    Manning, DP
    Collins, JW
    Holbein-Jenny, MA
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2001, 44 (13) : 1118 - 1137
  • [10] The rising number of underfoot accidents after the menopause causes both fractures and non-fracture injuries
    Davies, JC
    Manning, DP
    Kemp, GJ
    Frostick, SP
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 94 (12) : 699 - 707