Sensitivity of carbon sequestration costs to economic and biological uncertainties

被引:7
作者
Capalbo, Susan M. [1 ]
Antle, John M.
Mooney, Sian [2 ]
Paustian, Keith [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Econ, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Dept Appl & Agr Econ, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
carbon sequestration; soil C rates; marginal cost of soil C; integrated assessment approach; economic uncertainty; biophysical uncertainty; scale;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-003-9134-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Modifying current agricultural management practices as a means of sequestering carbon has been shown to be a relatively low cost way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the estimates of the amount of soil carbon sequestered and the costs of sequestering carbon to uncertainties in the underlying economic and biological parameters of the modeling framework and to scale of analysis. An application is made to the dryland grain production systems of the US northern Great Plains under a per-hectare payment policy. We show that the resulting changes in the marginal costs and corresponding quantities of soil carbon sequestered are a nonlinear function of the changes in the soil carbon rates, yields, or economic parameters, and depend upon the spatial heterogeneity of the area. The analysis of changes in yields supports the argument that sequestering soil C could be a long-term win-win situation for producers and society. In the short run, providing incentives to producers to switch production practices in order to sequester soil C could lead to higher productivity in the long run that would induce farmers to maintain these practices without incentives.
引用
收藏
页码:S238 / S251
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   SEQUESTERING CARBON ON AGRICULTURAL LAND - SOCIAL COST AND IMPACTS ON TIMBER MARKETS [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
ADAMS, DM ;
CALLAWAY, JM ;
CHANG, CC ;
MCCARL, BA .
CONTEMPORARY POLICY ISSUES, 1993, 11 (01) :76-87
[2]   Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture [J].
Antle, J ;
Capalbo, S ;
Mooney, S ;
Elliott, E ;
Paustian, K .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (02) :231-250
[3]   Sensitivity of carbon sequestration costs to soil carbon rates [J].
Antle, J ;
Capalbo, S ;
Mooney, S ;
Elliott, ET ;
Paustian, KH .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2002, 116 (03) :413-422
[4]  
Antle J. M., 1999, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V28, P96
[5]  
Antle JM, 2001, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V26, P344
[6]   Econometric-process models for integrated assessment of agricultural production systems [J].
Antle, JM ;
Capalbo, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 83 (02) :389-401
[7]  
ANTLE JM, 1999, AAEA ANN M NASHV TN
[8]  
JOHNSON JB, 1997, 21 MONT STAT U DEP A
[9]  
LAL R, 1998, POTENTIAL US CROP LA
[10]   CHANGES IN SOIL CARBON STORAGE AFTER CULTIVATION [J].
MANN, LK .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1986, 142 (05) :279-288