Retrospective cohort study of venlafaxine, fluoxetine or sertraline in long-term care

被引:0
作者
Blake, LM
Wan, GJ
Panish, JM
Buatti, MC
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Div Geriatr Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Wyeth Ayerst Res, Global Hlth Outcomes Assessment, Collegeville, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00044011-200323110-00006
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the effects of venlafaxine, fluoxetine and sertraline treatment on mood and behaviour patterns, physical functioning, and tolerability issues in a long-term care environment. Design, setting and participants: Retrospective cohort analysis of 257 elderly residents of three long-term care facilities in the US who used venlafaxine, fluoxetine or sertraline during a 3-month period. Main outcome measures: Indicators of depression, anxiety and sad mood, physical functioning, antidepressant-related adverse events, and the global impression of efficacy. Results: The average age of the participants was 80.6 years. At the 3-month follow-up, more than 85% of the residents recorded no change in indicators of depression, anxiety and sad mood or physical functioning, and there were no statistically significant differences among the three antidepressant drug groups. A marginal improvement in the social interaction indicator was observed among residents who received venlafaxine (11%) compared with those receiving fluoxetine (3%) or sertraline (2%). Antidepressant-related adverse events were infrequent and similar in incidence across the three drug groups. Conclusions: Indicators of mood and functioning of most residents were stable over the 3-month period and similar among the venlafaxine, fluoxetine and sertraline groups, and no significant differences in the safety profiles of the three drugs were recorded.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 742
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability [J].
Anderson, IM .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 58 (01) :19-36
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, MINIMUM DATA SET PLU
[3]   Factors associated with antidepressant treatment in residential care: changes between 1990 and 1997 [J].
Arthur, A ;
Matthews, R ;
Jagger, C ;
Lindesay, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 17 (01) :54-60
[4]  
Borson S, 1997, PSYCHIATR SERV, V48, P1289
[5]  
Brown PB, 2002, JAHRB GESCH OSTEUR, V50, P1
[6]   Development of a Minimum Data Set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes [J].
Burrows, AB ;
Morris, JN ;
Simon, SE ;
Hirdes, JP ;
Phillips, C .
AGE AND AGEING, 2000, 29 (02) :165-172
[7]   Psychometric characteristics of the Minimum Data Set I: Confirmatory factor analysis [J].
Casten, R ;
Lawton, MP ;
Parmelee, PA ;
Kleban, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1998, 46 (06) :726-735
[8]   Validity of diagnostic and drug data in standardized nursing home resident assessments - Potential for geriatric pharmacoepidemiology [J].
Gambassi, G ;
Landi, F ;
Peng, L ;
Brostrup-Jensen, C ;
Calore, K ;
Hiris, J ;
Lipsitz, L ;
Mor, V ;
Bernabei, R .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (02) :167-179
[9]  
GERSON SC, 1988, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V8, P311
[10]   VALIDATION OF THE MINIMUM DATA SET COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE SCALE - AGREEMENT WITH THE MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION [J].
HARTMAIER, SL ;
SLOANE, PD ;
GUESS, HA ;
KOCH, GG ;
MITCHELL, CM ;
PHILLIPS, CD .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 50 (02) :M128-M133