Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Brucella Isolates from Various Clinical Speciemens

被引:29
作者
Bayram, Yasemin [2 ]
Korkoca, Hanifi [3 ]
Aypak, Cenk [1 ]
Parlak, Mehmet [4 ]
Cikman, Aytekin [4 ]
Kilic, Selcuk [5 ]
Berktas, Mustafa [4 ]
机构
[1] Van Gevas Hosp, Dept Family Med, TR-65110 Van, Turkey
[2] Van Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Microbiol, TR-65100 Van, Turkey
[3] Mus Alparslan Univ, Sch Hlth, Dept Nursing, TR-49100 Mus, Turkey
[4] Van 100 Yil Univ, Dept Microbiol, TR-65100 Van, Turkey
[5] Refik Saydam Natl Hyg Ctr, Dept Communicable Dis Res, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Brucella; antimicrobial susceptibility; E-test; tigecycline; IN-VITRO ACTIVITIES; MELITENSIS; TIGECYCLINE; RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTICS;
D O I
10.7150/ijms.8.198
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Brucellosis is a worldwide zoonotic disease and still constitutes a major public health problem. In the study we claimed to identify Brucella species from clinical samples of patients with active brucellosis from Van region of Eastern Anatolia and to determine in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of these strains to commonly used anti-Brucella agents and a possible new alternative tigecycline. Materials and Methods: A total of 56 Brucella isolates were enrolled the study and the identification of the isolates were based on conventional methods. In vitro activities of antimicrobials were evaluated by the E test method. Results: All isolates were identified as B. melitensis. MIC90 values of doxycycline, streptomycin, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tigecycline were 0.064 mg/L, 1 mg/L, 2 mg/L, 0.125 mg/L and 0.094 mg/L, respectively. Tigecycline had low MIC50 and MIC90 values against all B. melitensis strains; the highest MIC observed was 0.25 mu g/mL. Conclusion: Our data suggest that tigecycline can be a therapeutic alternative option for the treatment of brucellosis.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 202
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   In vitro activities of antibiotics alone and in combination against Brucella melitensis at neutral and acidic pHs [J].
Akova, M ;
Gür, D ;
Livermore, DM ;
Kocagöz, T ;
Akalin, HE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 (05) :1298-1300
[2]  
Alton GG, 1988, TECHNIQUES BRUCELLOS, P34
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
Ayaslioglu E, 2008, TURK J MED SCI, V38, P257
[5]   In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Brucella species [J].
Baykam, N ;
Esener, H ;
Ergönül, Ö ;
Eren, S ;
Çelikbas, AK ;
Dokuzoguz, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2004, 23 (04) :405-407
[6]  
Black F T, 2004, INFECT DIS-NOR, P1665
[7]   Biotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Brucella isolates [J].
Bodur, H ;
Balaban, N ;
Aksaray, S ;
Yetener, V ;
Akinci, E ;
Çolpan, A ;
Erbay, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 35 (05) :337-338
[8]  
Ceylan E, 2003, VAN TIP DERG, V10, P1
[9]  
*CLIN LAB STAND I, 2006, 100S16 CLSI
[10]   RIFAMPICIN RESISTANCE IN A STRAIN OF BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS AFTER TREATMENT WITH DOXYCYCLINE AND RIFAMPICIN [J].
DELAROY, YMD ;
GRIGNON, B ;
GROLLIER, G ;
COINDREAU, MF ;
BECQGIRAUDON, B .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 18 (05) :648-649