Comparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cements

被引:22
作者
Bagheri, Rafat [1 ,3 ]
Mese, Ayse [2 ]
Burrow, Michael F. [3 ]
Tyas, Martin J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Dicle Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Dent Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Shear punch strength; Resin cements; GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; WATER SORPTION; COMPOSITE RESTORATIVES; DENTAL COMPOSITES; CERAMIC CROWNS; BOND STRENGTH; FILLER VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.014
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To measure the shear punch strength of eight resin-containing luting cements before and after immersion in acidic solution and ethanol at different temperatures (37 degrees C and 60 degrees C). Method: Specimens were prepared from six resin luting cements; Set (SDI), Panavia F (Kuraray), RelyX Veneer (3M/ESPE), Varioloinkll (Ivoclar), Maxcem (Kerr), Nexus2 (Kerr) and two Resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (RM-GICs); GC Fuji Plus (GC Corporation), RelyX Luting 2 (3 M/ESPE). For each material a total of 114 disc-shaped specimens were prepared. Six specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24h at 37 degrees C, polished and subjected to baseline measurement for shear punch strength. The remaining 108 specimens were randomly divided into 18 groups of six, and immersed in three solutions; distilled water, 0.01 mol/L lactic acid, and 50% ethanol at 37 degrees C or 60 degrees C, for 1 week, 1 month or 3 months. Specimens were washed, dried and tested for final shear punch strength. Results: Values were material and solution dependent. Values of Nexus 2 and Rely X Veneer are the highest, and Rely X Luting 2 the lowest. Ethanol and lactic acid specimens showed significantly lower values compared with the distilled water specimens. Conclusion: The shear punch strengths of the resin-containing luting cements were affected by time and storage solution. While some of the resin luting cements had significantly higher values compared to that of the RM-GICs, there were no significant differences between the RM-GICs and resin cements such as Panavia F and Set. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 827
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ASMUSSEN E, 1984, SCAND J DENT RES, V92, P257
[2]   Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents [J].
Attar, N ;
Tam, LE ;
McComb, D .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (02) :127-134
[3]  
Bagheri R, 2007, AM J DENT, V20, P329
[4]   Subsurface degradation of resin-based composites [J].
Bagheri, Rafat ;
Tyas, Martin J. ;
Burrow, Michael F. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (08) :944-951
[6]   Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements [J].
Cattani-Lorente, MA ;
Dupuis, V ;
Payan, J ;
Moya, F ;
Meyer, JM .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1999, 15 (01) :71-78
[7]  
Cheylan JM, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P365
[8]   Effect of resin matrix ratio, storage medium, and time upon the physical properties of a radiopaque dental composite [J].
Deepa, CS ;
Krishnan, VK .
JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2000, 14 (03) :296-315
[9]   Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics [J].
Diaz-Arnold, AM ;
Vargas, MA ;
Haselton, DR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (02) :135-141
[10]   Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements [J].
Ellakuria, J ;
Triana, R ;
Mínguez, N ;
Soler, I ;
Ibaseta, G ;
Maza, J ;
García-Godoy, F .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (04) :286-290