Plug-in electric vehicles in China and the USA: a technology and market comparison

被引:27
作者
Hao, Xu [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [2 ]
Wang, Hewu [1 ,3 ]
Ouyang, Minggao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Automot Safety & Energy, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst Div, 9700 South Cass Ave, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, China Automot Energy Esearch Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
对外科技合作项目(国际科技项目);
关键词
Plug-in electric vehicles; PEV market; PEV energy consumption test; INDUSTRIALIZATION; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11027-019-09907-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the top two plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) markets in the world, China and the United States of America (USA) have developed different market structures that are influenced by government policies, test procedures, customer acceptance, and vehicle performance. There are differences in PEV test procedures and vehicle class definitions as well. This paper quantifies such differences and compares PEV characteristics and markets in the two countries using actual data collected over several years. First, although China surpasses the USA in annual PEV production because of generous PEV policies and higher charging infrastructure availability, the USA has a higher PEV adoption rate per capita (2.3 versus 0.81 per 1000 people at the end of 2017). Second, the most popular vehicle classes are A00 battery electric vehicles (BEVs) in China but long-range mid-size BEVs in the USA. Moreover, China's electric and plug-in hybrid sport utility vehicle market is growing quickly. Third, the electricity consumption rated under Chinese test procedures is 20%-40% lower than that rated under US procedures. The sales-weighted electricity consumption of an average BEV in China is 23% lower than that in the USA because of larger proportions of small and micro BEVs in China. Fourth, PEV battery cost in the two countries is currently close to $210-$220 kWh. Finally, China has higher numbers of charging infrastructure, and the ratio of PEVs to public chargers is 9.0 in China versus 17.9 in the USA at the end of 2018.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 353
页数:25
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Global EV outlook 2017, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264278882-EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT REV B
[3]  
[Anonymous], NOT FIN SUPP POL PRO
[4]   AMPK Alters Detrusor Contractility During Emptying in Normal Bladder and Hypertrophied Bladder with Partial Bladder Outlet Obstruction via CaMKK [J].
Choi, Bo-Hwa ;
Jin, Long-Hu ;
Chung, Doo Yong ;
Cho, Tae Jin ;
Kang, Ju-Hee ;
Lee, Tack ;
Park, Chang-Shin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2019, 20 (11)
[5]   Insights into the characteristics of technologies and industrialization for plug-in electric cars in China [J].
Du, Jiuyu ;
Meng, Xiangfeng ;
Li, Jianqiu ;
Wu, Xiaogang ;
Song, Ziyou ;
Ouyang, Minggao .
ENERGY, 2018, 164 :910-924
[6]   Prospects for Chinese electric vehicle technologies in 2016-2020: Ambition and rationality [J].
Du, Jiuyu ;
Ouyang, Minggao ;
Chen, Jingfu .
ENERGY, 2017, 120 :584-596
[7]   Progress of Chinese electric vehicles industrialization in 2015: A review [J].
Du, Jiuyu ;
Ouyang, Danhua .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 188 :529-546
[8]  
Hai C., 2017, AUTOMOBILE PARTS, P39
[9]  
Hall D., 2017, Electric vehicle capitals of the world: What markets are leading the transition to electric?
[10]   China's traction battery technology roadmap: Targets, impacts and concerns [J].
Hao, Han ;
Cheng, Xiang ;
Liu, Zongwei ;
Zhao, Fuquan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 108 :355-358