GnRH-antagonist programming versus GnRH agonist protocol: a randomized trial

被引:12
作者
Klement, Anat Hershko [1 ]
Berkoyitz, Arie [1 ]
Wiser, Amir [1 ]
Gonen, Ofer [1 ]
Amichay, Keren [1 ]
Cohen, Ilan [1 ]
Ghetler, Yehudith [1 ]
Shulman, Adrian [1 ]
机构
[1] Meir Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IVF Unit, IL-44299 Kefar Sava, Israel
关键词
Pituitary hormone release inhibiting hormones; In vitro fertilization; Oocyte retrieval; Drug administration schedule; Patient schedule; ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE PILL; OVARIAN STIMULATION; PRETREATMENT; IVF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.12.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Testing the ability to program IVF GnRH-antagonist cycles to avoid weekend oocyte retrieval. Study design: Preliminary randomized clinical trial. Patients presenting an indication for IVF or IVF-ICSI were assigned into either the Treatment Group - GnRH antagonist protocol, programmed to start stimulatory agents on a Friday, with oral 2 mg estradiol valerate twice a day from the 2nd day of cycle until the first Friday to follow, or to the Control Group - long luteal GnRH agonist protocol. Results: The performance of 27 Treatment Group patients and 24 Control Group patients was analyzed. Cycle dynamics were not clinically or statistically different except for a significant difference in the number of follicles measuring >= 18 mm on hCG administration day. There were no differences in the number of aspirated ova, fertilization rates, embryo quality or number of embryos to be transferred. Pregnancy rate was 41.7% in the Treatment Group and 50% in the Control Group (P > 0.5). Only one patient assigned to the Treatment Group had a weekend retrieval. Conclusions: Preliminary results demonstrate no compromise related to follicular estrogen programming in a GnRH antagonist protocol and provide reassurance regarding the ability to achieve programming goals. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 173
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [11] Is it possible to reduce the incidence of weekend oocyte retrievals in GnRH antagonist protocols?
    Levy, Michael J.
    Ledger, William
    Kolibianakis, Efstratios M.
    IJzerman-Boon, Pieta C.
    Gordon, Keith
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 26 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [12] The effect of an individualized GnRH antagonist protocol on folliculogenesis in IVF/ICSI
    Mochtar, MH
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (08) : 1713 - 1718
  • [13] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoing debate
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Patrizio, Pasquale
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 26 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [14] The effect of oral contraceptive pill for cycle scheduling prior to GnRH-antagonist protocol on IVF cycle parameters and pregnancy outcome
    Pinkas, Haim
    Sapir, Onit
    Avrech, Ori M.
    Ben-Haroush, Avi
    Ashkenzi, Jacob
    Fisch, Benjamin
    Farhi, Jacob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2008, 25 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [15] In vitro fertilization for Orthodox Jewish couples: antagonist cycle modifications allowing for mikveh attendance before oocyte retrieval
    Reichman, David E.
    Brauer, Anate Aelion
    Goldschlag, Dan
    Schattman, Glenn
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (05) : 1408 - 1412
  • [16] Smulders B, 2010, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V20