Amphetamine-induced locomotor activation in 5-HT1B knockout mice:: effects of injection route on acute and sensitized responses

被引:20
作者
Bronsert, MR
Mead, AN
Hen, R
Rocha, BA
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] NIDA, Behav Neurosci Branch, Intramural Res Program, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Ctr Neurobiol & Behav, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Maryland Psychiat Res Ctr, Catonsville, MD 21228 USA
来源
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2001年 / 12卷 / 6-7期
关键词
knockout mice; 5-HT1B receptors; amphetamine; behavioural sensitization; locomotion; intraperitoneal injection; intravenous injection;
D O I
10.1097/00008877-200111000-00017
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Knockout mice lacking serotonin(1B) (5-hydroxytryptamine(1B); 5-HT1B) receptors (IBKO) exhibit increased sensitivity to the stimulant and reinforcing effects of indirect dopamine (DA) agonists and are more reactive to mild stressors such as handling and the injection procedures that commonly occur when using the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route of drug administration. Since the intravenous (i.v.) route of administration allows minimal handling and injection-induced stress, the present study was designed to evaluate the effect of the administration route on amphetamine-induced locomotor activation and behavioural sensitization in 1BKO mice. For this purpose, IBKO and wild-type (WT) control mice were administered i.p. or i.v. amphetamine in a within-session design, which allows evaluation of a complete dose-response curve within a single session. The locomotor stimulant effects of i.p. (0.5-4.0 mg/kg) and i.v. (0.6-1.2 mg/kg) amphetamine were investigated both acutely and following repeated treatments (four treatments at 48 h intervals). The results showed that acute i.p. amphetamine injection induced a significant higher horizontal activity peak effect in 1BKO mice, while this difference was less profound after acute i.v. injection. However, repeated i.p. or i.v. administration of amphetamine induced significantly higher locomotion in 1BKO mice. We conclude that the stimulant effects of amphetamine can be influenced by the route of administration in a genotype-dependent manner, and that route of drug administration (and associated variables) should be considered an important factor in studies of psychostimulant action in knockout mice. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Anteinaan S. M., 1983, STIMULANTS NEUROCHEM, P269
[2]   TIME-DEPENDENT SENSITIZATION AS THE CORNERSTONE FOR A NEW APPROACH TO PHARMACOTHERAPY - DRUGS AS FOREIGN STRESSFUL STIMULI [J].
ANTELMAN, SM .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 1988, 14 (01) :1-30
[3]   INTERCHANGEABILITY OF STRESS AND AMPHETAMINE IN SENSITIZATION [J].
ANTELMAN, SM ;
EICHLER, AJ ;
BLACK, CA ;
KOCAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4428) :329-331
[4]   CHRONIC STRESS INDUCES STRAIN-DEPENDENT SENSITIZATION TO THE BEHAVIORAL-EFFECTS OF AMPHETAMINE IN THE MOUSE [J].
BADIANI, A ;
CABIB, S ;
PUGLISIALLEGRA, S .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1992, 43 (01) :53-60
[5]   Absence of 5-HT1B receptors is associated with impaired impulse control in male 5-HT1B knockout mice [J].
Bouwknecht, JA ;
Hijzen, TH ;
van der Gugten, J ;
Mass, RAA ;
Hen, R ;
Olivier, B .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 49 (07) :557-568
[6]  
CABIB S, 1993, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V4, P367
[7]  
CAMERON DL, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P6763
[8]   Modulation of the effects of cocaine by 5-HT1B receptors: a comparison of knockouts and antagonists [J].
Castanon, N ;
Scearce-Levie, K ;
Lucas, JJ ;
Rocha, B ;
Hen, R .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 67 (03) :559-566
[9]   Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving [J].
Childress, AR ;
Mozley, PD ;
McElgin, W ;
Fitzgerald, J ;
Reivich, M ;
O'Brien, CP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 156 (01) :11-18
[10]   Infusion of a D-1 receptor agonist into the nucleus accumbens enhances cocaine-induced behavioural sensitization [J].
De Vries, TJ ;
Cools, AR ;
Shippenberg, TS .
NEUROREPORT, 1998, 9 (08) :1763-1768