Environmental and health implications of nanotechnology -: Have innovators learned the lessons from past experiences?

被引:24
作者
Koehler, Andreas R. [1 ]
Som, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Labs Mat Testing & Res EMPA, CH-9014 St Gallen, Switzerland
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2008年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
environment; health; innovation; lessons learned; nanotechnology; risk assessment; risk communication; technological risk;
D O I
10.1080/10807030802071812
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Nanotechnology (NT) is expected to bring about novel technological designs and materials resulting in a wide spectrum of applications. Experience gained from past innovations shows that new technologies are often accompanied by undesired side-effects. If such side-effects are neglected or underestimated, they may result in damage. In this article we examine whether innovators, the pioneers of technological advance in nanotechnology, are aware of the lessons that can be learned from adverse effects that have occurred in connection with several past innovations. Based on the results of a survey taken among innovators we discuss what consequences the innovators draw for the present innovation process and which priorities they set when dealing with environmental and health risks of nanotechnology. Results suggest that innovators may be not very sensitive to early scientific warnings regarding risks of nanotechnology. The innovators are confident that risks are assessable and manageable on a "business as usual" basis. They consider lacking public acceptance as a potential hurdle for innovation and many innovators are afraid of a backlash. Nevertheless, they seldom engage in risk communication or stakeholder dialogue. Picking up recommendations voiced by the innovators interviewed, we sketch some possible approaches as to how innovators could tackle the potential risks of nanotechnology in a proactive manner.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 531
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The right not to know: an autonomy based approach [J].
Andorno, R .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2004, 30 (05) :435-439
[2]  
ANTON PS, 2001, 2015 RAND
[3]  
*BMU, 2006, BLICKW WIRTSCH
[4]   Scientific cultures of non-knowledge in the controversy over genetically modified organisms (GMO) - The cases of molecular biology and ecology [J].
Boeschen, Stefan ;
Kastenhofer, Karen ;
Marschall, Luitgard ;
Rust, Ina ;
Soentgen, Jens ;
Wehling, Peter .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2006, 15 (04) :294-301
[5]  
Borm P. J. A., 2006, PARTICLE FIBRE TOXIC, V3
[6]  
BOZEMAN B, 2007, S T RES POLICY, V36, P807
[7]   What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology? [J].
Currall, Steven C. ;
King, Eden B. ;
Lane, Neal ;
Madera, Juan ;
Turner, Stacey .
NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (03) :153-155
[8]   How to assess the risks of nanotechnology: Learning from past experience [J].
Davis, J. Michael .
JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 7 (02) :402-409
[9]  
Dirk V., 2006, FUTURE NANOTECHNOLOG
[10]  
*EC, 2006, SCI TECHN HAS ALL MA, V379, P88