Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research

被引:36
作者
Wirtz, Bernd W. [1 ]
Weyerer, Jan C. [1 ]
Becker, Marcel [1 ]
Mueller, Wilhelm M. [1 ]
机构
[1] German Univ Adm Sci Speyer, Chair Informat & Commun Management, Postbox 1409, D-67324 Speyer, Germany
关键词
Open government data; Open data; Digital economy; Digital business; Literature review; Research agenda; OF-THE-ART; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; DATA PORTALS; DETERMINANTS; ANTECEDENTS; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; BARRIERS; INSIGHTS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Open government data (OGD) holds great potential for firms and the digital economy as a whole and has attracted increasing interest in research and practice in recent years. Governments and organizations worldwide are struggling in exploiting the full potential of OGD and require a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon. Although scientific debates in OGD research are intense and heterogeneous, the field lacks theoretical integration of OGD topics and their systematic consideration in the context of the digital economy. In addition, OGD has been widely neglected by information systems (IS) research, which promises great potential for advancing our knowledge of the OGD concept and its role in the digital economy. To fill in this gap, this study conducts a systematic literature review of 169 empirical OGD studies. In doing so, we develop a theoretical review framework of Antecedents, Decisions, Outcomes (ADO) to unify and grasp the accumulating isolated evidence on OGD in context of the digital economy and provide a theory-informed research agenda to tap the potential of IS research for OGD. Our findings reveal six related key topic clusters of OGD research and substantial gaps, opening up prospective research avenues and particularly outlining how IS research can inform and advance OGD research.
引用
收藏
页码:2381 / 2404
页数:24
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Open Government Data in Africa: A preference elicitation analysis of media practitioners
    Afful-Dadzie, Eric
    Afful-Dadzie, Anthony
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2017, 34 (02) : 244 - 255
  • [2] Analysing the Characteristics of Open Government Data Sources in Greece
    Alexopoulos, Charalampos
    Loukis, Euripidis
    Mouzakitis, Spiros
    Petychakis, Michalis
    Charalabidis, Yannis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2018, 9 (03) : 721 - 753
  • [3] Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective
    Altayar, Mohammed Saleh
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 35 (04) : 633 - 643
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, OPEN DATA BAROMETER
  • [5] A systematic review of open government data initiatives
    Attard, Judie
    Orlandi, Fabrizio
    Scerri, Simon
    Auer, Soeren
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (04) : 399 - 418
  • [6] Bachtiar A, 2020, INT C INF TECH SYST, P329, DOI [10.1109/ICITSI50517.2020.9264960, 10.1109/icitsi50517.2020.9264960]
  • [7] The Open Kimono: TOWARD A GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR OPEN DATA INITIATIVES IN CITIES
    Berrone, Pascual
    Ricart, Joan E.
    Carrasco, Carlos
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 59 (01) : 39 - 70
  • [8] Bogdanovic-Dinic S., 2014, PAIT, V5, P25, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-43, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-43]
  • [9] Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo
    Bonina, Carla
    Eaton, Ben
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2020, 37 (03)
  • [10] COVID AND 2020
    Callaway, Ewen
    Ledford, Heidi
    Viglione, Giuliana
    Watson, Traci
    Witze, Alexandra
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 588 (7839) : 550 - 552